[2021] KEHC 9199 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9199 (KLR)

The court found that although the appellant failed to comply with the original order to deposit the decretal sum within 30 days, and did not demonstrate good faith by making an offer within the requested three-month period, the interests of justice warranted a final opportunity. The court exercised its discretion to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9199 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Fuad Hussein Mohamed; Respondent: Adan Isaack Ibrahim
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 767 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Review of Stay Order
Outcome
Application partially allowed with conditions.
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Extension of Time, Review of Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Extension of Time Review of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fuad Hussein Mohamed

Appellant

Adan Isaack Ibrahim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Review of Stay Order

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be granted an extension of time to deposit the decretal sum in court as a condition for stay of execution.
  2. 2 Whether the court should review its earlier order regarding the stay of execution and the time for compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the appellant failed to comply with the original order to deposit the decretal sum within 30 days, and did not demonstrate good faith by making an offer within the requested three-month period, the interests of justice warranted a final opportunity. The court exercised its discretion to allow the appellant fourteen more days from the date of the ruling to deposit the decretal sum in court, extending the stay of execution for the same period. The respondent was awarded the costs of the application due to the appellant's delay and lack of prompt compliance.

Court Disposition

Application partially allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • The appellant shall deposit the decretal sum in court within fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling.
  • Stay of execution is extended by fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling.