[2022] KEELC 3850 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 3850 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st defendant died on November 18, 2018, and more than two years had passed without substitution, resulting in abatement of the suit against him. The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to strike out the deceased 1st defendant's name was merited, as it would allow the suit to proceed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 3850 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohamed Swaleh Fumo; Defendant: Bakari Farah; Defendant: Fatuma Farah
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 128 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint
Outcome
Application granted.
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Abatement of Suit, Death of Party, Leave of Court, Striking Out Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Abatement of Suit Death of Party Leave of Court Striking Out Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Swaleh Fumo

Plaintiff

Bakari Farah

Defendant

Fatuma Farah

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the plaint to strike out the name of the deceased 1st defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the suit against the 1st defendant has abated due to his death over two years ago.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st defendant died on November 18, 2018, and more than two years had passed without substitution, resulting in abatement of the suit against him. The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to strike out the deceased 1st defendant's name was merited, as it would allow the suit to proceed properly against the 2nd defendant only. The court was satisfied that the amendment was necessary for the just and conclusive determination of the issues before it. The application was therefore granted as prayed.

Court Disposition

Application granted.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the plaintiff to amend the plaint dated May 29, 2018 as per the draft amended plaint annexed.
  • Costs to be in the cause.