[2013] KEHC 5719 (KLR)
The court found that the IEBC failed to consider material evidence—specifically, affidavits of resignation by two nominees—when determining the petitioner's complaint regarding the ODM party list for Kwale County Assembly. This omission amounted to a misdirection and a breach of the duty to consider all relevant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5719 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Furaha Juma Sheba; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 317 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed in part; matter remitted to IEBC for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Party List Nominations, Electoral Disputes, Right to Fair Administrative Action
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Furaha Juma Sheba
Applicant
Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the IEBC failed to consider relevant evidence regarding the resignation of nominees for the Kwale County Assembly ODM party list.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to be nominated to the Kwale County Assembly based on the original or re-submitted party list.
- 3 Whether the IEBC's decision dismissing the petitioner's complaint was procedurally fair.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the IEBC failed to consider material evidence—specifically, affidavits of resignation by two nominees—when determining the petitioner's complaint regarding the ODM party list for Kwale County Assembly. This omission amounted to a misdirection and a breach of the duty to consider all relevant evidence in administrative decision-making. The court held that, in light of the evidence of resignation and the respondent's lack of objection to re-allocation, the IEBC must reconsider the nominations in the presence of all parties and re-allocate the seats if the petitioner is found to be on the party list and qualified. The court declined to intervene in internal party list...
Court Disposition
Petition allowed in part; matter remitted to IEBC for reconsideration.
Orders
- IEBC to reconsider the ODM Kwale County Assembly nominations in the presence of all parties, including the two nominees who allegedly resigned.
- IEBC to re-allocate the seats as prayed by the petitioner if she is found to be on the party list or a re-submitted list and qualified for nomination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CONSTITUTIONAL & HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISIONS
PETITION NO 317 OF 2013
FURAHA JUMA SHEBA …………………………………………………………………PETITIONER
VERSUS
INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL & BOUNDARIES COMMISSION ……..................…. RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
In her petition dated 19th June 2013, the petitioner alleges that she should have been the first to be considered for nomination to the Kwale County Assembly for the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM). She states that she and others were in the final list of prospective nominees for ODM in Kwale County, and that they only realized that they were short-changed when they saw the final ODM list. She alleges that the published list did not conform to the list agreed upon and was altered at the last minute.
The petitioner complained to the respondent vide complaint No IEBC/DRC/PL/58/2013 but her complaint was dismissed on 7th June 2013. She seeks declarations that the original list of nominees as confirmed in ODM’s letter of 25th March 2013 and supported by all elected leaders in Kwale County by their letter dated 16th March 2013 is the proper list of nominees for ODM for the County.
The petitioner further submitted that she ought to be nominated to the Kwale County Assembly since the three nominees are not eligible or are not taking up the seats for various reasons. She contended that one Fatuma Juma Nimakelele has expressed a desire to resign due to the nature of her business in an affidavit sworn on 10th May 2013; that one Fatuma Saidi Jirani similarly expressed her desire to resign, in an affidavit sworn on 10th May 2013, as she is a civil servant working at Kwale County Council, while Binti Omar Mwamuera is not an ODM member but a Conservative Party member.
In its response, the respondent counters that what the petitioner wishes to achieve is a re-allocation of the County Assembly seats for Kwale County. It submits that it has no objection to the re-allocation, but it cannot confirm whether or not the evidence alleged by the petitioner was before it when its decision of 7th June 2013 was made.
Determination
The court notes from the decision of the IEBC dated 7th June 2013 that no reference is made to the affidavits allegedly sworn and placed before it on 10th May 2013. The IEBC observes only that the issue before it was whether or not the nominees are members of ODM, and it dismisses the complaint on the basis that no evidence was placed before it to show that the nominees are not members of ODM.
From the documents annexed to the affidavit of the petitioner sworn on 19th June 2013 in support of the application for conservatory orders, the petitioner has annexed the two affidavits by the two nominees who opted not to take up the Kwale County Assembly seats, namely Fatuma Juma Nimakelele and Fatuma Saidi Jirani, both sworn on 10th May 2013 and received by the respondent on the same day as indicated by the stamp of the IEBC’s Directorate of Legal and Public Affairs.
It appears therefore that the IEBC failed to take into account evidence that was placed before it by the petitioner, and that it misdirected itself on the issue before it when it rendered its decision on the applicant’s complaint on 7th June 2013.
The respondent indicated at the hearing of this matter before us that it had no objection to re-allocation of the Kwale County Assembly seats provided that the nominees alleged to have resigned are present. While this court will not enter into the party issues regarding the alteration of the ODM party list for Kwale, we are of the view that if indeed the two nominees referred to above resigned, then a reconsideration of the matter, and re allocation of the nominations, is merited in this case in light of section 37(1) of the Elections Act.
Our directions therefore are that the IEBC reconsiders the position with regard to the ODM Kwale County Assembly nominations in the presence of all the parties, including the two nominees who allegedly resigned, and re-allocates the seats as prayed by the petitioner if the IEBC finds that she was on the party list or a re-submitted list and was qualified for nomination.
The respondent shall render its decision upon reconsideration of this matter within 14 days of today and thereafter gazette the ODM nominee to the Kwale County Assembly.
Each party shall bear its own costs of this petition.
Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 12th day of July 2013
MUMBI NGUGI D. S. MAJANJA WELDON KORIR
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE