https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12486

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12486

The Court found that there was no appearance or opposition from the Respondents and noted the lack of payment of the decretal sum despite an undertaking. On that basis, it allowed the application and issued summons requiring the Respondents to personally appear and show cause why they should not be committed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 12486 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff/applicant: PAUL KUTO FWAMBA; 1st Respondent: HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL; 2nd Respondent: BERNICE LEMEDEKET (Accounting Officer, Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government, Department of Kenya National Police Service)
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review E004 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Contempt Application Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed in part; summons to show cause issued.
Judges
["E Ominde"]
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Court Orders, Disobedience of Decree, Summons to Show Cause, Civil Jail Contempt Sanctions, Payment of Decretal Sum
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Enforcement of Court Orders Disobedience of Decree Summons to Show Cause Civil Jail Contempt Sanctions Payment of Decretal Sum

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PAUL KUTO FWAMBA

Plaintiff/applicant

HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL

1st Respondent

BERNICE LEMEDEKET (Accounting Officer, Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government, Department of Kenya National Police Service)

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Contempt Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Respondents wilfully disobeyed the court order issued on 5th February 2026
  2. 2 Whether the court should cite and punish the Respondents for contempt
  3. 3 Whether summons should issue for the Respondents to personally appear and show cause why they should not be committed to civil jail

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that there was no appearance or opposition from the Respondents and noted the lack of payment of the decretal sum despite an undertaking. On that basis, it allowed the application and issued summons requiring the Respondents to personally appear and show cause why they should not be committed to civil jail.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; summons to show cause issued.

Orders

  • Each Respondent shall personally appear before the Court on 13th October 2026 and show cause why they should not be committed to civil jail.
  • The Deputy Registrar shall ensure compliance with issuance and service of the summons upon the Respondents.