[2019] KEHC 11496 (KLR)
The court held that it has jurisdiction under Section 17 of the Matrimonial Property Act to declare and preserve property as matrimonial property if there is evidence that the property was acquired during the marriage. However, distribution of matrimonial property can only occur upon divorce or dissolution of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 11496 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: GMN; Respondent: JWM
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 30 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- The court directed that the hearing proceed by viva voce evidence to establish whether the properties are matrimonial property and preserved the properties pending further proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Declaration of Rights, Joint Registration, Property Preservation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GMN
Applicant
JWM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property known as NGONG/NGONG/[…] and its subdivisions constitute matrimonial property.
- 2 Whether the applicant and respondent were married under the law.
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to declare and preserve the suit properties as matrimonial property pending divorce proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it has jurisdiction under Section 17 of the Matrimonial Property Act to declare and preserve property as matrimonial property if there is evidence that the property was acquired during the marriage. However, distribution of matrimonial property can only occur upon divorce or dissolution of marriage as per Section 7 of the Act. Since the respondent denies the existence of a marriage, the applicant must first prove the marriage and acquisition of the property during its subsistence. The court can only preserve the property pending the outcome of divorce proceedings, and the matter should proceed by way of viva voce evidence to establish whether the properties are...
Court Disposition
The court directed that the hearing proceed by viva voce evidence to establish whether the properties are matrimonial property and preserved the properties pending further proceedings.
Orders
- The hearing of the case shall proceed by way of viva voce evidence to establish whether the properties are matrimonial property.
- The court preserves the suit properties pending determination of the matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
HIGH COURT CIVIL SUIT NO. 30 OF 2016 (O.S.)
IN THE MATTER OF MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY ACT,2013
GMN...............................PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
VERSUS
JWM.......................DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicant GMN filed the Originating Summons dated 8. 7.2016 seeking the following prayers;
(i) THAT this Honourable Court does order that the Property known as NGONG/NGONG/[…..] and now sub-divided into LAND PARCEL NOS. NGONG NGONG/[…..] & […..] be declared matrimonial property.
(ii) THAT this Honourable Court does order that the Property known as NGONG/NGONG/[…..] and now sub-divided into LAND PARCEL NOS. NGONG NGONG/[…..] & […..] be jointly registered in the names of GMN and JWM to hold in trust of their children.
(iii) THAT this Honourable Court do issue an order restraining the Defendant from evicting the Plaintiff and her/their children from the matrimonial home namely NGONG/NGONG/[…..] and now sub-divided into LAND PARCEL NOS. NGONG/NGONG […..] & […..].
(iv) The costs of this suit be awarded to the Plaintiff.
2. The Respondent in his reply has denied that he ever married the Applicant herein.
3. Section 17 of the Matrimonial Property Act provides as follows;
Action for declaration of rights to property
(1) A person may apply to a court for a declaration of rights to any property that is contested between that person and a spouse or a former spouse of the person.
(2) An application under subsection (1)—
(a) shall be made in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed;
(b) may be made as part of a petition in a matrimonial cause; and
(c) may be made notwithstanding that a petition has not been filed under any law relating to matrimonial causes.
4. This Court has jurisdiction under Section 17 of the Matrimonial Property Act to declare that the suit properties are Matrimonial Property and to preserve the same if there is evidence that the said properties were acquired during the subsistence of the marriage.
5. The party alleging marriage must prove the existence of the alleged marriage and also that the said properties were acquired by the parties during the subsistence of the said marriage
6. However, the said property can only be distributed in accordance with Section 7 of Matrimonial Property if the parties are divorced or if the marriage is dissolved.
7. Section 7 of Matrimonial Property Act provides as follows;
Ownership of matrimonial property
Subject to section 6(3), ownership of matrimonial property vests in the spouses according to the contribution of either spouse towards its acquisition, and shall be divided between the spouses if they divorce or their marriage is otherwisedissolved.
8. The Court with the Jurisdiction to hear Divorce causes in the Magistrate’s Court since the enactment of the Marriage Act 2014.
9. The issue of jurisdiction is premised on the following case;
OWNERS OF THE MOTOR VESSEL “LILLIAN S” vs. CALTEX OIL (KENYA) LTD [1989] KLR 1which providesthat:
“…Jurisdiction is everything. Without it, a court has no power to make one more step. Where a court has no jurisdiction, there would be no basis for a continuation of proceedings pending other evidence. A court of law downs tools in respect of the matter before it the moment it holds the opinion that it is without jurisdiction.”
10. In the current case, I find that the Court can only preserve the properties pending divorce proceedings by the parties. See the case of M.M.M. v W.N. K. (2019)Eklrwhere the court stated that It had jurisdiction to determine and preserve suit properties.
11. I direct that the hearing of this case proceeds by way of viva voce evidence only for purposes of establishing whether or not the said properties are matrimonial property.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED IN OPEN COURT THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2019
ASENATH ONGERI
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA, NAIROBI.