[2014] KEHC 5661 (KLR)
The court found that the Administrator had failed to comply with previous orders regarding the sale and distribution of the estate property and had frustrated the beneficiaries' access to their entitlements. The court reaffirmed its earlier orders that the property be sold to the highest bidder, but granted the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 5661 (KLR)
- Parties
- Objector: G W N; Petitioner: R W M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 202 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Execution of Distribution Orders
- Outcome
- Application allowed with conditions.
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Estate Administration, Distribution of Estate, Powers of Administrator, Sale of Estate Property
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G W N
Objector
R W M
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Execution of Distribution Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be authorized to execute conveyancing documents to facilitate the sale of the estate property as previously ordered.
- 2 Whether the Administrator has frustrated the distribution of the estate contrary to court orders.
- 3 Whether the Administrator should be given a final opportunity to match the highest bid for the property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Administrator had failed to comply with previous orders regarding the sale and distribution of the estate property and had frustrated the beneficiaries' access to their entitlements. The court reaffirmed its earlier orders that the property be sold to the highest bidder, but granted the Administrator a final opportunity to match the highest bid within fourteen days by paying the full amount to the Applicant's advocate. If the Administrator fails to do so, the Applicant is at liberty to proceed with the sale to the highest bidder, and the Deputy Registrar is authorized to execute all necessary conveyancing documents. This ensures compliance with the court's...
Court Disposition
Application allowed with conditions.
Orders
- The suit property shall be sold to the highest bidder as previously ordered.
- The Administrator is granted fourteen (14) days to match the highest bid by paying the full amount to the Applicant's advocate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.202 OF 2007
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M N N (DECEASED)
G W N…………………………………Objector
Versus
R W M………………………………Petitioner
R U L I N G
On 12th July 2011, this court delivered its judgment in respect of the dispute between the beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased relating to the distribution of the only property that comprised the estate of the estate of the deceased i.e. LR. No. [particulars withheld]. The material part of the judgment, the court rendered itself thus:
“The Petitioner, R W M and S W N, the unmarried daughters of the deceased shall each be entitled to inherit 30. 5% of the value. The three married daughters shall each be entitled to 13% of the said value. The petitioner and S W N shall be given the first option of purchasing the shares of the three married daughters. The two unmarried daughters shall pay off the married daughters the value of their shares within six (6) months from the date of the valuation of the suit property. There shall be no orders as to costs. Either party shall be at liberty to apply.”
There was no appeal against the decision of this court. S W N did not exercise her option to purchase the property within the six (6) months period that was provided by the court. On 2nd July 2012, the other beneficiaries filed an application before this court seeking permission to be allowed to sell the subject property to the highest bidder and thereafter have the proceeds therefrom be distributed as ordered by the court. The application was opposed by S W N. It was her case that she ought to have been given an opportunity to purchase the suit property. After considering the rival submission in respect of the matter, Musyoka J delivered his ruling on 27th June 2013. In the ruling, he allowed the application. He noted that S W N had been given all the opportunity to exercise the option to purchase the suit property but had failed to do so.
It is as a result of that ruling that the Objector G W N has filed the present application seeking the orders of this court for the Deputy Registrar to sign the application to the Land Control Board and all other conveyancing documents to enable her to transfer the suit property to the purchaser that shall be identified after the property is sold to the highest bidder. It was her case that the Administrator R W M had frustrated all efforts by the beneficiaries to have the suit property sold and the proceeds therefrom distributed to the beneficiaries as ordered by the court. In her response, the Administrator swore a Replying Affidavit. In the said affidavit, she deponed that the Applicant did not have mental capacity to prosecute the matter because she was mentally unfit. She further stated that she was willing to purchase the suit property and if the court allowed, she would deposit the sum of Kshs.2,000,000/- to the court being the value of the suit property. The Objector was not impressed by this offer and was of the view that it was yet another ploy by the Administrator to frustrate the distribution of the estate of the deceased.
At the hearing of the application, this court heard rival submission made by Mr. Mugu for the Applicant and by Mr. Misati for the Administrator. The facts of this Cause are not in dispute. The court has already rendered its determination in regard to how the estate of the deceased is to be distributed to the beneficiaries. From the pleadings filed, it is apparent that the Administrator has frustrated the beneficiaries from accessing what is due to them from the estate of the deceased. Although the Administrator has attempted to paint the issue in dispute as essentially the valuation of the suit property, this court’s assessment of the dispute is that in actual fact it is the Administrator who has proved to be a stumbling block in the distribution of the estate of the deceased to the beneficiaries.
This court will allow the application by the Applicant but with one caveat: as ordered by Musyoka J, the suit property shall be sold to the highest bidder. Upon receiving the highest bid, the Administrator shall be granted fourteen (14) days to match the highest bid. The Administrator shall be required to pay the amount to the Advocate of the Applicant in full within that period. If she fails to do so, the Applicant shall be at liberty to proceed and sell the suit property to the highest bidder. The Deputy Registrar of this Court shall then execute all the conveyancing documents in favour of such purchaser. It is so ordered.
DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014
L. KIMARU
JUDGE