[2013] KEHC 5478 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5478 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, through uncontroverted oral and documentary evidence, that he is the registered proprietor of the suit land. The defendants, having failed to enter appearance or contest the claim, were deemed to have no lawful claim or right to remain on the property. The court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5478 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gachunga Githagui; Defendant: Mary Gathiri; Defendant: Karuri Gathiri; Defendant: Njenga Gathiri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 280 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Judges
L Waithaka
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Injunctions, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Injunctions Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gachunga Githagui

Plaintiff

Mary Gathiri

Defendant

Karuri Gathiri

Defendant

Njenga Gathiri

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of land parcel Nyandarua/Tuluga/441 and entitled to exclusive possession.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants are trespassers on the suit land and should be evicted.
  3. 3 Whether a permanent injunction should issue restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's use and occupation of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, through uncontroverted oral and documentary evidence, that he is the registered proprietor of the suit land. The defendants, having failed to enter appearance or contest the claim, were deemed to have no lawful claim or right to remain on the property. The court held that the plaintiff's rights as a registered proprietor are protected by law and that the defendants' continued occupation constitutes trespass. Consequently, the court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's use and occupation of the land, ordered them to vacate within 30 days, and authorized their eviction in default, with...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their employees, servants or agents from entering, occupying, working, disposing, alienating, or in any other manner interfering with the plaintiff's quiet use and occupation of land parcel number Nyandarua/Tuluga/441 is issued.
  • The defendants to vacate the suit land within 30 days, failing which they shall be evicted.