[2025] KEHC 2871 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 2871 (KLR)

The court found that there was no basis to strike out the Party and Party Bill of Costs filed by the 1st Respondent. The withdrawal of the appeal with no orders as to costs did not preclude the 1st Respondent from filing a bill of costs, and the procedures for taxation of such bills are governed by the Advocates Act...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 2871 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mohan Galot; Respondent: Johnson Otieno Adera; Respondent: Tiego Makogonya Titus Tidal Tiego t/a Tiego & Co. Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E1421 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Motion to Strike Out Bill of Costs
Outcome
motion dismissed
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Striking Out Pleadings, Bill of Costs, Withdrawal of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Striking Out Pleadings Bill of Costs Withdrawal of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohan Galot

Applicant

Johnson Otieno Adera

Respondent

Tiego Makogonya Titus Tidal Tiego t/a Tiego & Co. Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Motion to Strike Out Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the Party and Party Bill of Costs filed by the 1st Respondent should be struck out after withdrawal of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent was entitled to file a bill of costs despite no substantive steps being taken in the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to strike out the bill of costs under the cited provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no basis to strike out the Party and Party Bill of Costs filed by the 1st Respondent. The withdrawal of the appeal with no orders as to costs did not preclude the 1st Respondent from filing a bill of costs, and the procedures for taxation of such bills are governed by the Advocates Act and the Civil Procedure Rules. The court emphasized that issues of taxation are within the purview of the Deputy Registrar and that the Respondent was at liberty to pursue the bill of costs as appropriate. The Applicant's reliance on the cited provisions did not establish that the bill of costs was an abuse of process or otherwise defective. Accordingly, the motion to strike...

Court Disposition

motion dismissed

Orders

  • The motion dated 2/8/2024 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.