[2001] KECA 80 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 80 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicant had raised an arguable point of law regarding the insurer's liability for voluntary passengers under the Insurance (Motor Vehicles Third Party Risks) Act. The Court further held that, given the respondent's lack of means and the substantial decretal sum, the success of the intended...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 80 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gateway Insurance Company Limited; Respondent: Catherine Ndinda Munyao
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 199 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for stay of execution granted
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Motor Vehicle Insurance, Third Party Liability, Declaratory Suits
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Insurance Law Tort Law Stay of Execution Motor Vehicle Insurance Third Party Liability Declaratory Suits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gateway Insurance Company Limited

Applicant

Catherine Ndinda Munyao

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a voluntary passenger in a private car is entitled to enforce a judgment against the insurer under Section 10(1) of the Insurance (Motor Vehicles Third Party Risks) Act.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending appeal where the respondent is not a person of means and the decretal sum is substantial.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant had raised an arguable point of law regarding the insurer's liability for voluntary passengers under the Insurance (Motor Vehicles Third Party Risks) Act. The Court further held that, given the respondent's lack of means and the substantial decretal sum, the success of the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if a stay was not granted. Therefore, the interests of justice required a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Court Disposition

application for stay of execution granted

Orders

  • A stay of execution of the decree in H.C.C.C. NO. 5806 OF 1993 dated 6th February, 2001 is granted pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal or further orders.
  • The costs of this application will be costs in the intended appeal.