[2021] KEHC 1342 (KLR)
The court found that the pleadings before it did not raise the paternity of the parties' children as an issue for determination in the divorce proceedings. Therefore, ordering a DNA test on RGM would not assist the court in resolving the matters in dispute. The application for a DNA test was thus found to lack merit...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1342 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: GDM; Respondent: CMM
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 1 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for DNA Test
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Divorce Proceedings, Paternity Dispute, Dna Testing, Child Welfare
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GDM
Plaintiff
CMM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for DNA Test
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order a DNA test on RGM to determine if he is the son of the Applicant.
- 2 Whether paternity is a material issue in the determination of the divorce petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the pleadings before it did not raise the paternity of the parties' children as an issue for determination in the divorce proceedings. Therefore, ordering a DNA test on RGM would not assist the court in resolving the matters in dispute. The application for a DNA test was thus found to lack merit and was dismissed, as the determination of paternity was not material to the divorce cause at hand.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent
Orders
- The notice of motion dated 19th April, 2021 is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
.REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
DIVORCE CAUSE NO.1 OF 2019
BETWEEN
GDM..................................................................................................PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
AND
CMM...............................................................................................RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
RULING
1. By a notice of motion dated 19th April, 2021, Respondent/Applicant prays for orders that the court be pleased to order for a DNA test on RGM to determine if he is the son of the Applicant.
2. The summons is supported by an affidavit sworn by the Applicant on 19th April, 2021 in which he reiterates the grounds on the face of the application.
3. The application is opposed on the basis of a replying affidavit sworn by the respondent on 19th July, 2021 mainly on the ground that the issue of paternity is immaterial to the orders sought in the petition for divorce.
Analysis and Determination
4. I have considered the notice of motion in the light of affidavits on record and submissions filed on behalf of both parties
5. As appreciated by Ngaah, J in FKW (suing as the mother and next friend of GDW (Minor) vs. DMM [2015] eKLR:
“……….. where it is in the best interests of the child that a paternity test should be undertaken; where there is no other means of determining the father of a child other than by means of a paternity test and therefore where such a test is necessary in the circumstances and, where, in any event, the applicant has made out a prima facie case for such a test, then a court of law will ordinarily make an order for such a test.
6. From the foregoing, it is apparent that the court is empowered to direct parties before it to undergo DNA test and there is nothing unconstitutional about that power in appropriate cases.
7. The pleading before the court disclose that paternity of the parties’ children is not one of the issues for determination.
8. Consequently, I have come to the conclusion that the application to subject RGM to DNA will not serve any meaningful purpose in aiding the court to reach an informed decision in determining the issues in dispute.
9. In the end, the notice of motion dated 19th April, 2021 is considered and found to have no merit. The same is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent.
DATED IN MERU THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Appearances
Court Assistant -Morris Kinoti
For Respondent /Applicant - Ms.Kinyua hb for Mr. Thuku for Kivuva Omuga & Co Advocates
For Plaintiff /Respondent - Mr.Kirimi for Kinyanjui, Kirimi & Co Advocates