[2020] KEELC 523 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 523 (KLR)

The court found that, pursuant to Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, it had jurisdiction to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal from its own ruling. Although there was an affidavit of service indicating that notice of delivery of the ruling had been served, the court noted that the matter was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 523 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: GECY Systems Limited; Defendant: Tom Odago Opiyo; Defendant: Maangi Otieno & Co. Advocates; Defendant: Registrar of Titles; Interested Party: Official Receiver & Liquidator of Credit Finance Limited; Interested Party: Kisauni Properties Limited; Applicant: Terazzo Enterprises Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1029 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time and Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application allowed; preliminary objection dismissed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Jurisdiction of High Court, Service of Ruling Notice
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Jurisdiction of High Court Service of Ruling Notice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GECY Systems Limited

Plaintiff

Tom Odago Opiyo

Defendant

Maangi Otieno & Co. Advocates

Defendant

Registrar of Titles

Defendant

Official Receiver & Liquidator of Credit Finance Limited

Interested Party

Kisauni Properties Limited

Interested Party

Terazzo Enterprises Limited

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time and Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time to file a notice of appeal from its own ruling.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was properly served with notice of the ruling and is entitled to extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, pursuant to Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, it had jurisdiction to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal from its own ruling. Although there was an affidavit of service indicating that notice of delivery of the ruling had been served, the court noted that the matter was not listed in the cause list for the date of the ruling, which may have been an oversight by the registry. Given this irregularity and in the interest of justice, the court granted the applicant the benefit of doubt and allowed the application for extension of time to file the notice of appeal out of time. The preliminary objection was dismissed as lacking merit.

Court Disposition

application allowed; preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the 3rd interested party/applicant to file a notice of appeal out of time against the ruling dated 9th October 2019.
  • The notice of appeal and letter to the Deputy Registrar are deemed duly filed upon payment of requisite fees.