[2025] KEELC 5307 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 5307 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant’s absence was occasioned by the bereavement of his advocate, which constituted sufficient cause for non-attendance. The court noted that the respondents would not suffer any prejudice if the proceedings were set aside and the interested party allowed to file a response and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 5307 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pro Riewa Onyango Genga; Respondent: Land Adjudication Officer Migori/Nyatike District; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary Ministry Of Lands And Housing; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Simon Oyier Genga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Petition E025 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Leave to File Response
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Late Filing of Response, Preliminary Objection, Adjudication Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Proceedings Late Filing of Response Preliminary Objection Adjudication Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pro Riewa Onyango Genga

Applicant

Land Adjudication Officer Migori/Nyatike District

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary Ministry Of Lands And Housing

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Simon Oyier Genga

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Leave to File Response

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of proceedings including delivery of judgment due to absence at hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the interested party should be allowed to file a response and preliminary objection out of time.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents would suffer prejudice if the application is allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant’s absence was occasioned by the bereavement of his advocate, which constituted sufficient cause for non-attendance. The court noted that the respondents would not suffer any prejudice if the proceedings were set aside and the interested party allowed to file a response and preliminary objection. In the interest of justice, and considering the absence was not deliberate or due to indolence, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the proceedings of 13/10/2023, allowed the interested party to file and serve a response and preliminary objection within seven days, and ordered the applicant to pay costs. The decision balanced the right to be heard...

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • The entire proceeding dated 13/10/2023 is set aside.
  • The interested party to file and serve response to the petition and preliminary objection within 7 days of this ruling.