[1997] KECA 357 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 357 (KLR)

The court found that the delay between the striking out of the original appeal and the filing of the present application was not long or inordinate. The omission of exhibits from the original record of appeal was attributed to a mistake or oversight rather than deliberate conduct, as there was no evidence to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 357 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geoffrey Chege Nuthu; Respondent: Averalli & Brothers
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 175 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Procedural Default
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Out of Time Procedural Default

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Chege Nuthu

Applicant

Averalli & Brothers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal after the original appeal was struck out as incompetent.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the application was inordinate or excusable.
  3. 3 Whether the omission of exhibits in the original record of appeal was deliberate or a genuine mistake.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay between the striking out of the original appeal and the filing of the present application was not long or inordinate. The omission of exhibits from the original record of appeal was attributed to a mistake or oversight rather than deliberate conduct, as there was no evidence to the contrary. The court held that the merits of the intended appeal were not for consideration at this stage. In light of all the circumstances, the court exercised its discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Notice of appeal to be filed within 7 days.
  • Record of appeal to be filed within 30 days thereafter.