[2008] KEHC 1814 (KLR)
The court found that the Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to divide and award registered land, a power reserved for the High Court under the Registered Land Act. The Tribunal's mandate under Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act is limited to boundary...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1814 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi; Respondent: Senior Principal Magistrate Githunguri; Respondent: Chairman Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Francis Njiri Kimani
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 27 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Substantive Motion
- Outcome
- Judicial review granted; Tribunal's decision quashed; enforcement prohibited; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Judicial Review, Certiorari and Prohibition, Registered Land Act, Division of Land, Ultra Vires Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi
Applicant
Senior Principal Magistrate Githunguri
Respondent
Chairman Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Francis Njiri Kimani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Substantive Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to divide and award registered land under the Registered Land Act.
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's decision to revoke the applicant's title and divide the land was ultra vires and subject to judicial review.
- 3 Whether the orders of certiorari and prohibition should issue to quash and restrain enforcement of the Tribunal's award.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to divide and award registered land, a power reserved for the High Court under the Registered Land Act. The Tribunal's mandate under Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act is limited to boundary disputes, claims to occupy or work land, and trespass, not to the division or ownership of registered land. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision to revoke the applicant's title and divide the land was ultra vires, null, and void. The court therefore granted orders of certiorari to quash the Tribunal's award and prohibition to restrain the Principal Magistrate's Court from...
Court Disposition
Judicial review granted; Tribunal's decision quashed; enforcement prohibited; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The decision of the Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal in respect of Land Parcel Githunguri/Gathangari/1835 is quashed by certiorari.
- An order of prohibition is issued restraining the Principal Magistrate Githunguri Court from enforcing or effecting the Tribunal's award No of 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Civil Case 27 of 2007
GEOFFREY KAMAU MWICHIGI ………… ………... APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE SENIOR PRICNIPAL MAGISTRATE
GITHUNGURI …………………………………1ST RESPONDENT
THE CHAIRMAN GITHUNGURI LAND
DISPTUES TRIBUNAL …………….………..2ND RESPONDENT
FRANCIS NJIRI KIMANI ……......……....….....3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
I: BACKGROUND
1. Both Francis Njiri Mwangi and Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi bought parcels of land from the original land parcel known as Githunguri/Gathangari/1241 Francis Njiri Mwangi (respondent No.3 herein) and paid Ksh.22,850/- in 1986 and took possession of the land. There was then, no title deed issued or land certificate given to him. Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi came thereafter in 1989 and bought his share. He then managed to get a land title certificate known as Githunguri/Gathangari/1835 and became the registered owner of his parcel of land but he then included the portion of land that was occupied and owned by Francis Njiri Mwangi.
2. Francis Njiri Mwangi had lived on his parcel of land for 20 years. Instead of filing a suit in the High Court of Kenya for Adverse Possession he went to the elders at the Githunguri Land Disputes Tribunal Court. They in turn awarded:-
i) Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi 0. 208 acres
and ii) Francis Njiri Kimani 0. 208 acres
3. This decision arose after hearing both parties at the tribunal .
4. The decision is then filed in the subordinate court for the award to be made part of the courts orders for purposes of enforcing the decision by the Lands Disputes Tribunal. A case SPM No.10/2007 was accordingly filed.
5. The registered owner of the land Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi had been informed that his title stands revoked and he is to share his land with Francis Njiri Kamani.
6. Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi filed for Judicial Review Proceeding on 15 October 2007. Leave was granted to him by the courts on 22 October 2007 (Rawal J). A Notice of Motion is required to be filed within 21 days of leave being granted. This was duly done on 8 November 2007.
II: Judicial Review Application 8 November 2007
7. The Exparte applicant Geoffrey Kamau Mwichigi served the Senior Principal Magistrate Githunguri. The chairman Githunguri Lands Disputes Tribunal and Francis Njiri Kamani herein referred to as the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondent respectively.
8. Only Francis Njiri Kimani appeared and did so in person.
9. The arguments put forward by the exparte applicant is that the Tribunal exceeded its mandate and powers as had been given to them by statute. The exparte applicant is the registered land owner and as a result should not be deprived of his land. The powers to divide land was irregular.
II: Opinion.
10. Judicial Review Proceeding is brought against a body that is administrative in nature or a government body which fails to follow the laid down procedure. If it exceeds its powers then their action is null void or ultra vires.
11. Under the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990 the Limitation of Jurisdiction of the Tribunal is under Section 3 that states:-
Subject to this act, all cases of a civil nature involving a dispute as to:-
a) The division of or the determination of boundaries to land, including land held in common.
b) A claim to occupy or work land or
c) Tresspass to land.
Shall be heard and determined by a Tribunal established under Section 4. ”
12. Under the above jurisdiction, the division of properties is not one of the mandates given to the tribunal. This lies only with the courts. The ownership of properties and subsequent division lies with the High Court if the property is under the Registered Lands Act. The subordinate courts limitation to hear land case is restricted to £25,000 or Ksh.500,000/- under the Registered Land Act. The Lands Disputes Tribunal have no limit what so ever to decide on the division of property and ownership of land.
13. I accordingly allow this Judicial Review Proceedings. I quash the decision of the tribunal by bringing in the decision to this court by way of Certiorari and Prohibition orders to prohibit the Principal Magistrate Githunguri Court from enforcing or effecting the award No of 2007 in respect of Land Parcel Githungur/Gathaga/1835.
14. I award no costs. Each party to these proceeding are to bear their own costs.
DATD THIS 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2008 AT NARIOBI.
M.A. ANGA’WA
JUDGE
J.K. Njuguna instructed by Kiarie Njuguna & Co. Advocates for the applicant
Francis Njiri Kimani 3rd Respondent in person – present