[2004] KEHC 1677 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 1677 (KLR)

The court found that, despite the absence of documentary evidence of the deceased's income, there was credible testimony that she was engaged in business and farming and was able to pay significant school fees. However, the claimed income of Ksh.100,000 per month was not substantiated. The court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 1677 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Karanja Muhoro & Another; Defendant: Daniel Muraya Wairagu & Another
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 277 of ??
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Assessment of Damages After Interlocutory Judgment on Liability
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of Ksh.338,445 with costs and interest.
Legal Topics
Fatal Accidents Act, Law Reform Act, Assessment of Damages, Loss of Dependancy, Pain and Suffering, Funeral Expenses
Source Language
en
Tort Law Fatal Accidents Act Law Reform Act Assessment of Damages Loss of Dependancy Pain and Suffering Funeral Expenses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Karanja Muhoro & Another

Plaintiff

Daniel Muraya Wairagu & Another

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Assessment of Damages After Interlocutory Judgment on Liability

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages payable to the plaintiff following the interlocutory judgment on liability.
  2. 2 How should the deceased's income be assessed in the absence of documentary evidence.
  3. 3 What heads of damages are recoverable under the Fatal Accidents Act and Law Reform Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite the absence of documentary evidence of the deceased's income, there was credible testimony that she was engaged in business and farming and was able to pay significant school fees. However, the claimed income of Ksh.100,000 per month was not substantiated. The court exercised its discretion to assess a reasonable monthly income at Ksh.5,000. Damages were awarded under the heads of loss of expectation of life, pain and suffering, loss of dependency (calculated as 2/3 of Ksh.5,000 per month for four years), and funeral expenses. The total award was Ksh.338,445, with costs and interest to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of Ksh.338,445 with costs and interest.

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded Ksh.338,445 as damages.
  • Plaintiff to have costs of the suit.