[2010] KEHC 2495 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was properly entered, as the charge and facts were read to him in Swahili and he confirmed their truth. The claim that the proceedings were not interpreted into his mother tongue was deemed an afterthought, unsupported by the record. The sentence of seven years was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2495 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Geoffrey Kibet Basuben; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 304 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except for reduction of sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Stock Theft, Plea of Guilty, Language of Proceedings, Sentencing Principles
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Kibet Basuben
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's plea of guilty was unequivocal and properly entered.
- 2 Whether the proceedings were conducted in a language understood by the appellant.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive or harsh in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was properly entered, as the charge and facts were read to him in Swahili and he confirmed their truth. The claim that the proceedings were not interpreted into his mother tongue was deemed an afterthought, unsupported by the record. The sentence of seven years was within the statutory maximum for stock theft, but considering the appellant's youth and remorse, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to three years. The appeal against conviction was dismissed, and only the sentence was varied.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except for reduction of sentence.
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a sentence of three years imprisonment.
- The appeal against conviction is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 304 of 2009
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.2108 of 2008 of the Principal Magistrate’s court at Molo – S.M.S. SOITA, PM)
GEOFFREY KIBET BASUBEN……………...…APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………..…RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
GEOFFREY KIBET BASUBEN,the appellant was charged with the offence of stock theft contrary to Section 278 of the Penal Code.When he appeared before court on
11th September 2009for plea, be pleaded not guilty and was remanded pending the hearing.When his case was mentioned on9th October 2009he changed his plea and pleaded guilty to the charge upon which he was convicted and sentenced to seven years imprisonment.He has appealed against both the conviction and sentence.
Although in the circumstances his appeal should have been against sentence only, as I have said he has also appealed against conviction. In his submissions he contends that he did not understand the charge because it was not interpreted into his mother tongue, Kipsigis language, which he says is the only language he understands.He also contends that he was misled in the remand prison to plead guilty.On sentence he argues that the same is excessive and extremely harsh.He therefore prays that the conviction be quashed and the sentence be set aside.
I find no merit in the appeal against conviction.The record shows that the charge was read to the appellant in Swahili language and he pleaded guilty.After that the facts were read out and he confirmed that they were true.Therefore his claim that the proceedings were not interpreted to the language he understands is clearly an afterthought.I dismiss his appeal against conviction.
The offence of stock theft carries a sentence of 14 years imprisonment.The sentence of seven years imprisonment imposed upon the appellant is therefore not harsh.However, because the appellant is only twenty years old and remorseful I reduce the sentence to three years imprisonment.
Safe for the reduction of sentence as stated above this appeal is dismissed in its entirety.
DATED and DELIVERED this 27th day of April, 2010.
D. K. MARAGA
JUDGE.