[2017] KEELC 497 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 497 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in the present application had already been determined in a previous suit (Case No. 608 of 2012), where an order was issued for the Uasin Gishu District Surveyor and Land Registrar to mark the boundaries between the disputed parcels. The plaintiff in the current matter was the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 497 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Kipkemboi Lelei; Defendant: Alice Jepkoech Yano
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 125 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Boundary Disputes, Res Judicata
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctions Boundary Disputes Res Judicata

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Kipkemboi Lelei

Plaintiff

Alice Jepkoech Yano

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with parcel Eldoret/Municipality Block 15/1889.
  2. 2 Whether the court should order the County Land Registrar and District Land Surveyor to mark the boundary between the disputed parcels.
  3. 3 Whether the matter is res judicata in light of previous orders issued in Case No. 608 of 2012.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in the present application had already been determined in a previous suit (Case No. 608 of 2012), where an order was issued for the Uasin Gishu District Surveyor and Land Registrar to mark the boundaries between the disputed parcels. The plaintiff in the current matter was the 6th respondent in the earlier case, and the court had already made a substantive order on the boundary issue. Therefore, the doctrine of res judicata applied, barring the plaintiff from re-litigating the same issues. The application for injunction and further orders was dismissed as it lacked basis, having already been addressed by the court.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 20.5.2016 is dismissed with costs to the defendant.