[2022] KEHC 711 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 711 (KLR)

The court found that section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code requires mandatory consideration of the period spent in custody prior to sentencing. The judge cited relevant case law confirming that unless there are reasonable grounds, the sentence must account for pre-sentence custody. Since the applicant had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 711 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geoffrey Kipkirui Morogo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E018 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Computation
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Sentencing Procedure, Pre Sentence Custody, Murder Offence, Penal Code Section 333 2
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Procedure Pre Sentence Custody Murder Offence Penal Code Section 333 2

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Kipkirui Morogo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Computation

  1. 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be included in the computation of the applicant's sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence of forty years imprisonment should run from the date of first arraignment or from the date of sentencing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code requires mandatory consideration of the period spent in custody prior to sentencing. The judge cited relevant case law confirming that unless there are reasonable grounds, the sentence must account for pre-sentence custody. Since the applicant had been in custody since 14/10/2015 and was sentenced on 28/7/2020, the court held that the forty-year sentence should be computed from the date of first arraignment, not the date of sentencing. The application was therefore allowed, and the sentence ordered to run from 14/10/2015.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The sentence of forty (40) years imprisonment shall run from 14/10/2015, the date the applicant was first arraigned, and not from 28/7/2020 when he was sentenced.