[2019] KEHC 10804 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 10804 (KLR)

The court held that the applicant failed to provide any of the statutory grounds required under Section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code to justify the extension of time to file an appeal. The applicant's explanation, based on reliance on a relative to hire an advocate and lack of fees, did not meet the legal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 10804 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geoffrey Kyalo Mativo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 70 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
CM Kariuki
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Criminal Appeals, Delay in Filing, Grounds for Extension
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Criminal Appeals Delay in Filing Grounds for Extension

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Kyalo Mativo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the grounds advanced by the applicant meet the threshold under Section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code for extension of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant failed to provide any of the statutory grounds required under Section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code to justify the extension of time to file an appeal. The applicant's explanation, based on reliance on a relative to hire an advocate and lack of fees, did not meet the legal threshold. Furthermore, the delay of seven months was not explained satisfactorily. Consequently, the court declined to grant the prayers sought and dismissed the application.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to file an appeal out of time is dismissed.