[2015] KEHC 3298 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3298 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had established a case for the preservation of the suit land through an order of inhibition, as they had been in occupation for over 40 years and the land was the subject of the ongoing suit. However, the court held that the joinder of the 3rd and 4th respondents was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3298 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geoffrey Mbaabu; Applicant: Solomon M'Etaya; Respondent: M'Maingi M'Laaru; Respondent: Jacob Mioro M'Laaru; Respondent: Patrick Kiburi Bariu; Respondent: Jacob Muciku M'Imunya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 6 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Joinder
Outcome
partly allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Joinder of Parties, Temporary Injunctions, Adverse Possession, Land Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Inhibition Orders Joinder of Parties Temporary Injunctions Adverse Possession Land Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Mbaabu

Applicant

Solomon M'Etaya

Applicant

M'Maingi M'Laaru

Respondent

Jacob Mioro M'Laaru

Respondent

Patrick Kiburi Bariu

Respondent

Jacob Muciku M'Imunya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Joinder

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an order of inhibition over the suit land parcels pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to amend the originating summons to join the 3rd and 4th respondents as parties.
  3. 3 Whether a temporary injunction should issue restraining the respondents from interfering with the applicants' occupation of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had established a case for the preservation of the suit land through an order of inhibition, as they had been in occupation for over 40 years and the land was the subject of the ongoing suit. However, the court held that the joinder of the 3rd and 4th respondents was not appropriate at this stage, as the originating summons was not originally directed at them and any claim against them should be pursued in a fresh suit. The court also found that the applicants had not established grounds for a temporary injunction against the respondents, particularly the 3rd and 4th respondents who were in occupation of their parcels. Consequently, the court granted...

Court Disposition

partly allowed

Orders

  • Orders of inhibition are to be registered against Parcel Nos NJIA/CIA-MWENDWA/640, 587, 3088, 3089 and 1545 pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  • The prayer for enjoining Patrick Kiburi Bariu and Jacob Muciku M'Imunya is declined and dismissed.