[2018] KEELRC 1605 (KLR)
The court held that section 90 of the Employment Act does not allow for extension of time to file a suit once the limitation period has lapsed. The applicant's reliance on the union's conciliation efforts and the subsequent holding of his file by a law firm did not provide a legal basis for extending the statutory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1605 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Geoffrey Mudanya; Respondent: Muthaiga Golf Club
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 11 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Suit Out of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- NJ Abuodha
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Unlawful Termination, Conciliation Process, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Mudanya
Applicant
Muthaiga Golf Club
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Suit Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can grant leave to file a suit for unlawful termination outside the limitation period set by section 90 of the Employment Act.
- 2 Whether the period spent in conciliation or with the union/law firm can justify extension of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 90 of the Employment Act does not allow for extension of time to file a suit once the limitation period has lapsed. The applicant's reliance on the union's conciliation efforts and the subsequent holding of his file by a law firm did not provide a legal basis for extending the statutory period. The court found its hands tied by the clear language of the statute and dismissed the application for leave to file suit out of time.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to file suit out of time is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
MISC APP 11 OF 2016
GEOFFREY MUDANYA..................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
MUTHAIGA GOLF CLUB.........................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. By an originating motion filed on 5th February, 2016 the applicant sought leave to file a suit out of time. The application was brought on the grounds among others that on 10th June, 2003, the applicant was unlawfully terminated by the respondent and that the suit could not be filed within time because of the intervention of his union KUDHEIHA who initiated the process through a letter dated 16th December, 2004. After the union was unable to reach an agreement with the respondent, the matter was referred to the Ministry of Labour for conciliation.
2. The Ministry of Labour after consideration of both parties submissions made its findings and recommendations dated 16th August, 2009 which were received by the union on 9th Septembert, 2009. The Ministry of Labour recommended that the claimant be paid all his dues as per the CBA. The applicant further stated that his file was held by the law firm of Bower Mahiu & Co from the period between the year 2012 to 11th February, 2015 since the applicant was unable to raise the fees required.
3. Section 90 of the Employment Act does not seem to yield an interpretation that a suit can be filed once the time set by the section has lapsed. Conciliation in this matter was concluded by the Ministry of Labour on 16th April, 2009. How the claimants file moved from the union, who was handling the matter on his behalf to the law firm of Mahihu & Co Advocates who he claimed held the file until 2015 because he could not raise the requisite fee is not understandable.
4. It is unfortunate that section 90 of the Act does not allow for extension of time once it has lapsed. The courts’ hands are therefore tied and the application inevitably fails and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
5. It is so ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 6th day of July, 2018
Abuodha Jorum Nelson
Judge
Delivered this 6th day of July, 2018
Abuodha Jorum Nelson
Judge
In the presence of:-
………………………………for the Claimant and
………………………..………for the Respondent