[2015] KEELRC 335 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 335 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was verbally dismissed by the respondent, as the respondent's evidence regarding resignation was hearsay and uncorroborated. The claimant's evidence was uncontested and credible. The court held that the dismissal was unfair and that the claimant was entitled to one month's salary in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 335 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Geoffrey Muema; Respondent: Multiple Hauliers E.A. Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 143 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed; claimant awarded notice pay, unpaid salary, leave, and compensation for unfair termination; claims for overtime, rest days, and service pay dismissed; respondent's counterclaim dismissed.
Judges
DO Ogal, HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Leave Entitlements, Compensation for Dismissal, Service Pay, Overtime Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice Pay Leave Entitlements Compensation for Dismissal Service Pay Overtime Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Muema

Claimant

Multiple Hauliers E.A. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant resigned or was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies sought, including notice pay, unpaid salary, leave, overtime, service pay, and compensation for unfair termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was verbally dismissed by the respondent, as the respondent's evidence regarding resignation was hearsay and uncorroborated. The claimant's evidence was uncontested and credible. The court held that the dismissal was unfair and that the claimant was entitled to one month's salary in lieu of notice, unpaid salary for February and March 2012, leave for 2007 and 2012, and compensation equivalent to 12 months’ salary. Claims for overtime, rest days, and service pay were dismissed due to lack of evidence or statutory ineligibility. The respondent's counterclaim for notice pay was not supported by evidence.

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed; claimant awarded notice pay, unpaid salary, leave, and compensation for unfair termination; claims for overtime, rest days, and service pay dismissed; respondent's counterclaim dismissed.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant one month's salary in lieu of notice (Kshs.9,654.00).
  • Respondent to pay claimant unpaid salary for February and March 2012 (Kshs.10,619.00).