[2005] KECA 258 (KLR)

[2005] KECA 258 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal on the severity of sentence, as such matters are considered questions of fact under section 361(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Since the appellant's appeal was solely on the ground of severity of sentence, the appeal was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KECA 258 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Geoffrey Yogen Kibet; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 131 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent.
Legal Topics
Appeals on Sentence, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal, Criminal Sentencing, Corporal Punishment
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeals on Sentence Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal Criminal Sentencing Corporal Punishment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Yogen Kibet

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal on the severity of sentence imposed by the High Court.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's sentence could be reduced by the Court of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal on the severity of sentence, as such matters are considered questions of fact under section 361(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Since the appellant's appeal was solely on the ground of severity of sentence, the appeal was incompetent and was accordingly struck out.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent.

Orders

  • The appellant's appeal is struck out.