[2019] KEHC 3222 (KLR)
The court held that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the applicants was unconstitutional, necessitating a sentence rehearing. Despite the applicants being first offenders, the reconciliation between the families, and the recommendation for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 3222 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Geoffrrey Kipkorir Tonui; Applicant: Benard Kiplangat Tonui; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 1 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Sentence Re Hearing Ruling
- Outcome
- Sentence varied; applicants to serve fifteen years' imprisonment from date of original sentence, subject to remission.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Death Sentence, Sentence Rehearing, Constitutional Rights, Murder Conviction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrrey Kipkorir Tonui
Applicant
Benard Kiplangat Tonui
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Sentence Re Hearing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed on the applicants should be reviewed in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to a non-custodial sentence or a reduced custodial sentence after serving over ten years in prison.
- 3 Whether reconciliation between the applicants and the deceased's family should influence the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the applicants was unconstitutional, necessitating a sentence rehearing. Despite the applicants being first offenders, the reconciliation between the families, and the recommendation for non-custodial sentences, the court found that a non-custodial sentence was not appropriate given the gravity of the offence. Taking into account the period already served (over ten years), the court set aside the previous sentence and ordered each applicant to serve fifteen years' imprisonment from the date of the original sentence, subject to remission. The court emphasized the...
Court Disposition
Sentence varied; applicants to serve fifteen years' imprisonment from date of original sentence, subject to remission.
Orders
- The existing sentences are set aside.
- Each applicant to serve fifteen years' imprisonment from the date of sentencing by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2016
(Arising from Court of Appeal No.130 of 2009 at Nakuru
Original Criminal Case No.44 of 2005 at Kericho High Court)
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 22 (1), 258 (2), 259 (1), 23
(3),25 ( C ), 27, 28, 48, 49 (G), 50 (1), 50 (2) (Q), 50 (2) (O), 165 (3) OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 203 AS READ WITH
SECTION 204 OF THE PENAL CODE CAP 63 LAWS OF KENYA
BETWEEN
GEOFFRREY KIPKORIR TONUI......1ST PETITIONER/APPLICANT
BENARD KIPLANGAT TONUI..........2ND PETITIONER/APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.........................................................................RESPONDENT
SENTENCE RE-HEARING RULING
1. This matter arose from a murder case which was heard and determined in Kericho High Court Criminal Case No.44 of 2005. The two applicants herein were tried and convicted of murder, and sentenced to suffer death. They appealed to the Court of Appeal in Nakuru Criminal Appeal No.130 of 2009, and 10th June 2011 the Court of Appeal – Bosire, Onyango Otieno and Visram JJA dismissed their appeal.
2. The matter has again come back to this court under a Miscellaneous Application, following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Francis Karioko Mumatetu & Another vs Republic – Supreme Court Petition No.15 of 2015 in which the Supreme Court declared the mandatory nature of the death sentence to be unconstitutional and directed sentence re-hearing of previous similar cases where mandatory death sentence was imposed by the other courts.
3. The present Miscellaneous application was brought to this court through a petition filed by counsel Onesmus Langat & Company Advocates for the two applicants, who are brothers, for sentence rehearing in line with the Supreme Court decision.
4. Counsel for the applicants and the Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions made submissions before me, and the court thereafter ordered the filing of pre-sentence reports and the Probation Officer, Kericho Francis Obayi filed a report on each of the two applicants. I have perused and considered the two reports, which suggest non-custodial sentences.
5. I note that bot convicts (applicants) are first offenders, and that there is a common position taken by the applicants’ counsel and the State that the family of the accused persons (who are brothers), and the family of the deceased person have now reconciled. I appreciate that the accused were sentenced in June 2009, more than 10 years now, and were actually in custody since October 2005 when they were charged in court.
6. The two convicts are still convicts for murder not the lesser offence of manslaughter, and I am told by the Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions that the death sentences have already been commuted to life imprisonment. Though I appreciate that reconciliation between the families has taken place, in my view a non-custodial sentence proposed by the Probation Officer is not appropriate. The accused persons having now served a period of ten (10) years imprisonment, I set aside the existing sentence, and order that they each serve a period of fifteen (15) years imprisonment from the date they were sentenced by the trial court. The above prison sentence is subject to any remissions that are applicable at the disposal of the Prison authorities.
Dated and delivered at Kericho this 29th day of October 2019.
George Dulu
JUDGE