[2021] KEHC 8243 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8243 (KLR)

The court determined that since the preliminary objection and the application for review directly relate to an order made by Sergon J, it is appropriate and procedurally correct for Sergon J to address the objection and any related applications. The matter is therefore to be placed before Sergon J for further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8243 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Geophrey Odhiambo Majiwa; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General; Defendant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Defendant: Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission; Defendant: Nairobi City County
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 277 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Directions on Preliminary Objection and Review Application
Outcome
Matter referred to original judge for directions.
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Review of Orders, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Preliminary Objection Review of Orders Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geophrey Odhiambo Majiwa

Plaintiff

Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Director of Public Prosecutions

Defendant

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission

Defendant

Nairobi City County

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Directions on Preliminary Objection and Review Application

  1. 1 Whether the preliminary objection should be determined by the current judge or the judge who made the original order.
  2. 2 Whether the application for review is properly before the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that since the preliminary objection and the application for review directly relate to an order made by Sergon J, it is appropriate and procedurally correct for Sergon J to address the objection and any related applications. The matter is therefore to be placed before Sergon J for further directions, rather than being determined by the current judge.

Court Disposition

Matter referred to original judge for directions.

Orders

  • The file shall be placed before Sergon J on 5th May, 2021 for appropriate directions.