[2021] KEELRC 2381 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2381 (KLR)

The Court found that the petitioner failed to file any response to the 1st respondent's application to be struck out, despite being granted multiple opportunities and clear directions by the Court. The absence of a response or opposition to the application, coupled with the 1st respondent's assertion that it was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2381 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: George Bala; Respondent: Chuka University; Respondent: Egerton University
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 15 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Petition / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Respondent and Petition as Against 1st Respondent
Outcome
Application allowed; 1st respondent struck out from the suit and petition as against it struck out.
Legal Topics
Misjoinder of Parties, Striking Out Petition, Reasonable Cause of Action
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Misjoinder of Parties Striking Out Petition Reasonable Cause of Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Bala

Applicant

Chuka University

Respondent

Egerton University

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Respondent and Petition as Against 1st Respondent

  1. 1 Whether the 1st respondent was improperly joined to the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the petition disclosed a reasonable cause of action against the 1st respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the petitioner failed to file any response to the 1st respondent's application to be struck out, despite being granted multiple opportunities and clear directions by the Court. The absence of a response or opposition to the application, coupled with the 1st respondent's assertion that it was improperly joined and that no reasonable cause of action was disclosed against it, led the Court to allow the application as prayed. The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural directions and the necessity for a party to demonstrate a reasonable cause of action against a respondent for the suit to be maintained against them.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; 1st respondent struck out from the suit and petition as against it struck out.

Orders

  • The application dated 10th February, 2021 is allowed as prayed.
  • The 1st respondent is struck out from the suit.