[2016] KEHC 7335 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7335 (KLR)

The court found that the grant of letters of administration was obtained irregularly, as the respondent failed to inform or obtain the consent of the applicant, a beneficiary residing abroad. The evidence, including affidavits from other siblings, established that the property Kijabe/Kijabe Block 1/371 was purchased...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 7335 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: George Gitau Kamau; Respondent: Samuel Ruiru Kamau
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 663 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant revoked; suit property declared not part of estate; new administrators appointed; respondent to account for proceeds.
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Beneficiary Consent, Trust Property, Distribution of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Beneficiary Consent Trust Property Distribution of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Gitau Kamau

Applicant

Samuel Ruiru Kamau

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently or without the knowledge and consent of all beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the property Kijabe/Kijabe Block 1/371 forms part of the deceased's estate or is held in trust for the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent properly accounted for and distributed the proceeds of the deceased's bank account among the beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grant of letters of administration was obtained irregularly, as the respondent failed to inform or obtain the consent of the applicant, a beneficiary residing abroad. The evidence, including affidavits from other siblings, established that the property Kijabe/Kijabe Block 1/371 was purchased by the applicant and held by the deceased in trust for him, and thus did not form part of the deceased's estate. The respondent failed to account for the proceeds of the deceased's bank account and did not provide evidence to rebut the applicant's claims. In the absence of any contrary evidence, the court held that the applicant's prayers were merited and ordered revocation of...

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant revoked; suit property declared not part of estate; new administrators appointed; respondent to account for proceeds.

Orders

  • The grant issued to Samuel Ruiru Kamau on 20th September 2011 and confirmed on 6th March 2012 is revoked under Section 76 (b) & (c) of Succession Act.
  • The suit property Kijabe/Kijabe/1/371 belongs to the applicant George Gitau Kamau and is not part of the deceased’s estate.