[2018] KEELC 4110 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4110 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided valid reasons for seeking to withdraw the application, namely that it related to a different court's matter and that he was misled into filing it. Guided by Article 159 of the Constitution and Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court held that there was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4110 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: George Loch Mbuya Ogola; Respondent: Florence Mugunga Okea; Respondent: Hassan Abdi Hersi & Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 891 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal of Application
Outcome
Application withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Execution of Decree, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Withdrawal of Application Execution of Decree Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Loch Mbuya Ogola

Applicant

Florence Mugunga Okea

Respondent

Hassan Abdi Hersi & Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal of Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw the application without an order as to costs.
  2. 2 Whether the application for execution of the decree in Kisumu Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 199 of 2001 was properly before this court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided valid reasons for seeking to withdraw the application, namely that it related to a different court's matter and that he was misled into filing it. Guided by Article 159 of the Constitution and Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court held that there was no reason to bar the applicant from withdrawing the application. The court further determined that the withdrawal should be allowed with no order as to costs, as the application had not been served on the respondents and no prejudice would be occasioned.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application is withdrawn.
  • No order as to costs.