[2016] KEELRC 219 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 219 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to file a defence or contest the claimant's evidence, and thus the claimant's account was unchallenged. The termination was effected without valid reason and without adherence to fair procedure as required by sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claimant was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 219 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: George Morara Nyang’au; Respondent: Creative Consolidated Systems Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 544 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in full.
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Employment Contracts, Terminal Benefits, Notice Pay, Service Gratuity
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Employment Contracts Terminal Benefits Notice Pay Service Gratuity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Morara Nyang’au

Claimant

Creative Consolidated Systems Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's employment was unlawfully and unfairly terminated.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal benefits including notice pay, compensation, and service gratuity.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to remit statutory deductions as required by law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to file a defence or contest the claimant's evidence, and thus the claimant's account was unchallenged. The termination was effected without valid reason and without adherence to fair procedure as required by sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claimant was not paid notice pay, compensation for unfair termination, or service gratuity, and the respondent failed to remit statutory deductions. The court therefore awarded the claimant one month salary in lieu of notice, compensation equivalent to the unserved term of the contract, and service gratuity, totaling Kshs.300,000, with interest and costs.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in full.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs.40,000 as one month salary in lieu of notice.
  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs.240,000 as compensation for unfair and unlawful termination.