[2021] KEBPRT 395 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 395 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the applicant's application was properly served and remained unopposed, with no response from the respondents. The applicant established that the landlord, through the auctioneer, had proclaimed goods for disputed rent arrears without providing a statement of accounts. The tribunal was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 395 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: George Mugoye Mbeya t/a Mugoye & Associates Advocates; Respondent: Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 255 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Commercial Landlord Tenant Disputes, Interlocutory Injunctions, Rent Arrears, Proclamation of Goods
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Commercial Landlord Tenant Disputes Interlocutory Injunctions Rent Arrears Proclamation of Goods

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Mugoye Mbeya t/a Mugoye & Associates Advocates

Applicant

Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the landlord and its agents should be restrained from interfering with the tenant's occupation and enjoyment of the suit premises pending determination of the application.
  2. 2 Whether the claimed rent arrears are due and owing by the tenant.
  3. 3 Whether the landlord's failure to provide a statement of accounts justifies the grant of injunctive relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the applicant's application was properly served and remained unopposed, with no response from the respondents. The applicant established that the landlord, through the auctioneer, had proclaimed goods for disputed rent arrears without providing a statement of accounts. The tribunal was satisfied that the applicant had demonstrated a prima facie case and that irreparable harm would result if the orders were not granted. Accordingly, the tribunal allowed the application and restrained the landlord and its agents from interfering with the tenant's occupation and enjoyment of the premises pending determination of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The landlord, auctioneer, and their agents are restrained from interfering in any manner with the tenant's tenancy, occupation, and enjoyment of the suit premises pending hearing and determination of the application.