[2017] KEELRC 1200 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1200 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant was employed by the Respondent and that his employment was terminated without notice, valid reason, or a hearing, contrary to Sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act. The Respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or provide any justification for the termination. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1200 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: George Muyesi Mbaru; Respondent: ARM Cement formerly known as Athi River Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 197 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed for the Claimant.
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement, Service Pay, Compensation for Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice Pay Annual Leave Entitlement Service Pay Compensation for Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Muyesi Mbaru

Claimant

ARM Cement formerly known as Athi River Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair under the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, annual leave pay, and service pay.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to public holiday pay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant was employed by the Respondent and that his employment was terminated without notice, valid reason, or a hearing, contrary to Sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act. The Respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or provide any justification for the termination. The Claimant established his entitlement to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, annual leave pay, and service pay (less N.S.S.F. contributions). The claim for public holiday pay was rejected due to lack of sufficient evidence. The court declared the termination unfair and awarded the Claimant a total of Kshs. 122,936 plus costs and interest.

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed for the Claimant.

Orders

  • It is declared termination was unfair.
  • The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant 12 months’ wages in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 78,624; 1 month wages as notice pay at Kshs. 6,552; annual leave pay at Kshs. 26,460; and service pay at Kshs. 11,300 – total Kshs. 122,936.