[2020] KEHC 6745 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6745 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial court's apportionment of liability between the appellants (1st and 2nd) and the 2nd respondent was supported by the evidence, as the only direct testimony on the accident came from the 1st respondent, a pillion passenger. The court rejected the appellants' argument that the 1st...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6745 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: George Njoroge Kariuki; Appellant: RT. (East Africa) Limited; Respondent: Charles Musyoka; Respondent: James Gachunga Maina; Respondent: Nakuru Equipment Supplies Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 3 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal on liability dismissed; appeal on quantum allowed in part; quantum reduced by 10% for contributory negligence; judgment entered for the 1st respondent for Kshs. 2,538,112.50 apportioned between appellants and 2nd respondent.
Judges
EC Mwita
Legal Topics
Road Traffic Accidents, Apportionment of Liability, Quantum of Damages, Contributory Negligence
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Road Traffic Accidents Apportionment of Liability Quantum of Damages Contributory Negligence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Njoroge Kariuki

Appellant

RT. (East Africa) Limited

Appellant

Charles Musyoka

Respondent

James Gachunga Maina

Respondent

Nakuru Equipment Supplies Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial court erred in apportioning liability between the appellants and the 2nd respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the award of general damages was inordinately high.
  3. 3 Whether special damages were properly pleaded and proved.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial court's apportionment of liability between the appellants (1st and 2nd) and the 2nd respondent was supported by the evidence, as the only direct testimony on the accident came from the 1st respondent, a pillion passenger. The court rejected the appellants' argument that the 1st respondent contributed to the accident, noting he was not the rider. However, the court held that the 1st respondent contributed to the extent of his injuries by failing to wear a helmet, attributing 10% negligence to him for this reason. On quantum, the court found the award of general damages was not inordinately high given the nature of the injuries, and that special damages...

Court Disposition

Appeal on liability dismissed; appeal on quantum allowed in part; quantum reduced by 10% for contributory negligence; judgment entered for the 1st respondent for Kshs. 2,538,112.50 apportioned between appellants and 2nd respondent.

Orders

  • Judgment for the 1st respondent for Kshs. 2,538,112.50 inclusive of general and special damages.
  • Appellants to pay Kshs. 1,776,678.75; 2nd respondent to pay Kshs. 761,433.75.