[2010] KEHC 2749 (KLR)
The court found the defendant fully liable for the accident as the plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged due to the defendant's failure to file a defence. The court accepted the plaintiff's account that the deceased was lawfully crossing the road and was fatally injured by the defendant's vehicle due to negligent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2749 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: George Ogeto Menge (suing as personal representative of the Estate of Zablon Menge Ogeto – Deceased); Defendant: Linear Coach Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 284 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Interlocutory Judgment Entered for Default of Defence
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for Kshs. 370,050 plus costs and interest at court rates.
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accidents Act, Law Reform Act, Negligence, Damages Assessment, Loss of Dependency
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Ogeto Menge (suing as personal representative of the Estate of Zablon Menge Ogeto – Deceased)
Plaintiff
Linear Coach Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Interlocutory Judgment Entered for Default of Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was liable for the fatal accident involving the deceased.
- 2 What quantum of damages is payable to the estate and dependants of the deceased under the Fatal Accidents Act and Law Reform Act.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff proved special damages claimed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the defendant fully liable for the accident as the plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged due to the defendant's failure to file a defence. The court accepted the plaintiff's account that the deceased was lawfully crossing the road and was fatally injured by the defendant's vehicle due to negligent driving. In assessing damages, the court awarded Kshs. 10,000 for pain and suffering, Kshs. 360,000 for loss of dependency (using an assumed monthly income of Kshs. 3,000, a multiplier of 30, and a dependency ratio of 1/3), and Kshs. 50 for special damages (death certificate only), as no documentary proof was provided for other special damages. The court declined to award damages...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for Kshs. 370,050 plus costs and interest at court rates.
Orders
- The defendant shall pay the plaintiff Kshs. 370,050 as damages.
- The defendant shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII
Civil Suit 284 of 2002
GEORGE OGETO MENGE (suing as personal representative ofthe Estate ofZABLON MENGEOGETO – DECEASED) ……………………..…………… PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
LINEAR COACH COMPANY LIMITED ……….……. DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff is the personal representative of the estate of Zablon Menge Ogeto, hereinafter referred as to“the deceased.”The defendant was the registered owner of a motor vehicle registrationNo. KAL 561 B.On 11th March 2000 the deceased was lawfully crossing the Kericho-Sotik road when the defendant’s driver controlled the defendant’s motor vehicle so negligently that it hit the deceased occasioning him fatal injuries.The plaintiff brought this action for the benefit of the dependants of the deceased under theFatal Accidents Actand for the benefit of the deceased’s estate under theLaw Reform Act.The deceased’s dependants were listed as:
-Peris Mogoi Ogeto (mother)
-Wilfred Ogeto (brother)
-Robert Makoro (brother)
-Florence Nyamisa (sister)
At the time of his death the deceased was aged 20 years and was a farmer.He enjoyed good health and lived a happy and vigorous life.The deceased was employed as a tea plucker at Changoi Estate earning Kshs. 6,000/= per month.
The plaintiff claimed general damages as well as special damages as hereunder:
(a)Police Abstract …………… Kshs. 100/=
(b)Death certificate …………………..100/=
(c)Cost of coffin ………….. Kshs. 5,000/=
(d)Funeral expenses ….… Kshs. 5,000/=.
The defendant did not file any defence and interlocutory
judgment in default of defence was entered on 25th April 2003. Formal proof was done on 10th May 2005. Only the plaintiff testified.
The plaintiff’s counsel was directed to file written submissions but the court file could not be traced for quite sometime.The submissions were eventually filed on 29th September 2009 and on 1st March 2010 this file was placed before me for preparation of the judgment though the matter was heard before Bauni, J.
As regards liability, the plaintiff’s evidence was unchallenged and I hold that the plaintiff proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant’s driver was to blame for the occurrence of the said accident.I enter judgment on full liability for the plaintiff as against the defendant.
Regarding general damages under theFatal Accidents Act, for pain and suffering, I award a sum of Kshs. 10,000/= since the deceased died almost immediately after the said accident.For loss of dependency, the plaintiff testified that the deceased’s mother, his brother and sister were dependent on him.The plaintiff did not produce any documentary evidence to prove that the deceased was employed as a tea plucker and was earning a monthly salary of Kshs. 6,000/=.In the absence of such proof I will assume that the deceased was earning a sum of Kshs. 3,000/= per month and apply a multiplier of 30. Since he was a bachelor, I will adopt a dependency ratio of 1/3 and tabulate the claim for loss of dependency as hereunder:
3,000 x12 x 30 x 1/3= 360,000/=.
Special damages
No documentary evidence was produced in support of the claims for a police abstract, cost of coffin and funeral expenses.I will therefore award nothing for those claims.The Death certificate that was produced asP. Exhibit 2shows that the fees paid for the same was Kshs. 50/= which I hereby award.
I will not make any award for loss of expectation of life.In any event, even if I awarded the same I would still be obliged to discount it considering that the benefits payable under theFatal Accidents Actand theLaw Reform Actwill be made to the same dependants andthey should not benefit twice from the same cause of action.SeeKEMFRO AFRICA LIMITED & ANOTHER –VS- LUBIA & ANOTHER (NO. 2)[1987] KLR 30.
I now enter judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant as hereunder:
(a) Pain and suffering …………………………… Kshs. 10,000/=
(b) Special damages ……………………………… Kshs. 50/=
(c) Loss of dependency ………………………… Kshs. 360,000/=
Total Kshs. 370,050/=
The plaintiff will also have costs of the suit plus interest at court rates.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISII THIS 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2010.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.
20/4/2010
Before D. Musinga, J.
Mobisa – cc
Mr. Kaburi for Mr. Odongo the Plaintiff
N/A for the Defendant
Court:Judgment delivered in open court on 20th April, 2010.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.