[2017] KEELRC 794 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 794 (KLR)

The court found that the basis of the claim—the validity of the 2011 Nairobi Branch elections—had been overtaken by subsequent events, specifically the holding of new elections in 2004 and the replacement of the officials elected in 2011. As a result, the prayers sought in the amended memorandum of claim were no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 794 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: George Ondiege; Applicant: Elkanah Mwinami; Applicant: Eunice Ngina Mbuta; Respondent: Albert Obed Njeru/KUDHEIHA Workers; Respondent: Registrar of Trade Unions; Respondent: Patrick Karanja/KUDHEIHA Nairobi Branch; Respondent: Hopkins Ogutu & Others
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 134 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed as moot
Legal Topics
Trade Union Elections, Union Officials Removal, Registrar of Trade Unions Powers
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Elections Union Officials Removal Registrar of Trade Unions Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Ondiege

Applicant

Elkanah Mwinami

Applicant

Eunice Ngina Mbuta

Applicant

Albert Obed Njeru/KUDHEIHA Workers

Respondent

Registrar of Trade Unions

Respondent

Patrick Karanja/KUDHEIHA Nairobi Branch

Respondent

Hopkins Ogutu & Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Nairobi Branch elections held on 29th January 2011 were valid in light of the Registrar of Trade Unions' cancellation.
  2. 2 Whether the court should declare the elections irregular and order fresh elections.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the basis of the claim—the validity of the 2011 Nairobi Branch elections—had been overtaken by subsequent events, specifically the holding of new elections in 2004 and the replacement of the officials elected in 2011. As a result, the prayers sought in the amended memorandum of claim were no longer capable of being granted, and the court could not issue any orders regarding the disputed elections or related forms. The consolidated suits were therefore dismissed as moot, with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed as moot

Orders

  • The consolidated suits Nos. 134/2011; 429/2012; 420/2012 and 407/2014 are dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.