[2010] KEHC 2309 (KLR)
The court held that the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide for the filing of a supplementary petition of appeal or supplementary grounds of appeal. Any amendment to the petition of appeal must be made with leave of the court, following the procedure set out in Section 350(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2309 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: George Otieno Opudo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 182 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Supplementary Petition of Appeal
- Outcome
- supplementary petition of appeal struck out
- Judges
- DK Musinga
- Legal Topics
- Appeals Procedure, Supplementary Grounds, Leave of Court, Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Otieno Opudo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Supplementary Petition of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a supplementary petition of appeal or supplementary grounds of appeal can be filed without leave of the court under the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the supplementary petition of appeal filed by the appellant should be struck out for lack of leave.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide for the filing of a supplementary petition of appeal or supplementary grounds of appeal. Any amendment to the petition of appeal must be made with leave of the court, following the procedure set out in Section 350(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant's counsel failed to seek leave to amend the petition of appeal and instead filed a document not recognized by law. Consequently, the supplementary petition of appeal was irregularly filed and must be struck out.
Court Disposition
supplementary petition of appeal struck out
Orders
- The supplementary petition of appeal is hereby struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
42 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII
Criminal Appeal 182 of 2009
(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence of the SRM’s court
at Oyugis in criminal case No. 233 of 2008 – C.L. Yalwala, RM)
BETWEEN
GEORGE OTIENO OPUDO ……………….……………………. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ..……………………………………………………… RESPONDENT
RULING
On26th August 2009the appellant through his advocates, M/s Oguttu-Mboya & Company, filed a petition of appeal which contains 10 grounds of appeal.
On17th February, 2010the appellant’s advocate filed a“supplementary petition of appeal”and set out“supplementary grounds of appeal.”
When the appeal came up for hearing on23rd March, 2010, Mr. Mutai, Senior State Counsel, urged the court to strike out the supplementary petition of appeal as the same had been filed without leave of the court.He said that the law does not recognize a
supplementary petition of appeal or supplementary grounds of appeal.
Mr. Ochwangi for the appellant responded by stating that there is no provision in the Criminal Procedure Code that stipulates that leave must be sought before an appellant can file a supplementary record of appeal.He added that no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent by the supplementary record of appeal.
Section 350 (2)of theCriminal Procedure Codeclearly states that “the appellant shall not be permitted, at the hearing of the appeal, to rely on a ground of appeal other than those set out in the petition of appeal.”
The proviso to the aforesaid section highlights several instances under which the petition of appeal may be amended.
The relevant ones in this case are(iv)and(v)which provide as follows:
“(iv) Save as provided in paragraph (i), a petition of appeal may only be
amended with the leave of the High Court and on such terms and
conditions, whether as to costs or otherwise, as the High Court may
see fit to impose;
(v) Notice in writing of an application for leave to amend a petition of appeal
shall be given to the Registrar of the High Court and to the Attorney-
General not less than three clear days, or such shorter period as the High
Court may in any particular case allow, before the application is made;
and the application for leave to amend a petition of appeal shall be made
either at the hearing of the appeal or, if made previously, by way of
motion in open court.”
From the foregoing, it is clear that the Criminal Procedure Code does not make any provision for either supplementary petition of appeal or supplementary grounds of appeal.However, the petition of appeal may, with leave of the court, be amended as deemed necessary.The appellant’s counsel filed a strange document and when the learned state counsel raised an objection to the same, instead of simply applying for leave to amend the petition of appeal, Mr. Ochwangi took a wrong position in law as earlier stated.
The so called supplementary petition of appeal is hereby struck out.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisii on this 24th day of March, 2010
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.
24/3/2010
Before D. Musinga, J.
Mobisa – cc
Mr.Kamau HB for Mr. Ocwhangi for the Appellant
Mr. Kemo for the respondent
Court:Ruling delivered in open court on24th March, 2010.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.