[2015] KEHC 4509 (KLR)
The court held that the application was fatally defective for failing to join Kennedy Otieno Ndede, the person directly affected by the orders sought, thus violating the rules of natural justice. Additionally, the court found that the Director of Public Prosecutions retains constitutional discretion to initiate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 4509 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: George Ouoma Bwana; Respondent: Officer Commanding Awendo Police Station; Respondent: Inspector General of the Police; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 9 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Private Prosecution, Prosecutorial Discretion, Joinder of Parties, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Ouoma Bwana
Applicant
Officer Commanding Awendo Police Station
Respondent
Inspector General of the Police
Respondent
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can compel the police and Director of Public Prosecutions to arrest and prosecute a named individual for assault.
- 2 Whether the alleged offender, Kennedy Otieno Ndede, should have been joined as a party to the proceedings.
- 3 Whether the applicant has a right to seek private prosecution if the Director of Public Prosecutions declines to prosecute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application was fatally defective for failing to join Kennedy Otieno Ndede, the person directly affected by the orders sought, thus violating the rules of natural justice. Additionally, the court found that the Director of Public Prosecutions retains constitutional discretion to initiate prosecutions, and there was no evidence that the DPP had been requested and had declined to prosecute the alleged offender. Therefore, the applicant was not entitled to the orders sought, and the court could not compel the DPP or police to arrest and prosecute without the DPP first exercising discretion. The application was dismissed on these grounds.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 11th April 2014 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2015
BETWEEN
GEORGE OUMA BWANA ….......................................................................... APPLICANT
AND
OFFICER COMMANDING AWENDO
POLICE STATION …………………………………………...……… 1ST RESPONDENT
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE POLICE ……………………..…. 2ND RESPONDENT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ..................................... 3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The application before the Court is made pursuant to sections 66, 69, 88 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Chapter 75 of the Laws of Kenya). It seeks the following orders;
(a). That the Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to arrest the said Kennedy Otieno Ndede and charge him before court of competent jurisdiction for an offence of assault as provided in the Penal Code (Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya).
2. Mr. Sagwe, counsel for the applicant, submitted that the applicant was assaulted by one Kennedy Otieno Ndede on 30th January 2014. He laid a complaint at Awendo Police Station where he was referred for treatment at Awendo Sub-District Hospital where he received medication and was issued with a P3 Form. He states that the OCS, Awendo Police Station has refused to issue warrants of court as required by law hence this application.
3. When the matter came up for hearing, I asked Mr. Sagwe whether it was necessary to join the said Mr. Kennedy Otieno Ndede as a party directly affected by the orders. He said it was not necessary as he could not arrest himself and as it was the duty of the respondents to do so.
4. In my view, the said Kennedy Otieno Ndede is a party directly affected and he ought to have been joined to these proceedings. This court, if it proceeded otherwise, would be abetting a breach of natural justice.
5. On the substance of the application, it must be recalled that the Director of Public Prosecutions, under Article 157 of the Constitution retains overall authority to commence prosecutions. There is no evidence that this office has been requested and has declined to prosecute the third party in which case the applicant would have the right to seek leave to prosecute the matter privately.
6. Furthermore, the order sought would be imposing an obligation or burden on the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to launch a prosecution without him having exercised his discretion to do so.
7. In the circumstances, I reject the Notice of Motion dated 11th April 2014. It is dismissed.
DATED and DELIVERED at MIGORI this 19th day of June 2015
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr Sagwe instructed by Sagwe & Company Advocates for the applicant.
Ms Owenga, Senior Prosecuting Counsel, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions.