[2021] KEHC 1010 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1010 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had taken all necessary preliminary steps towards lodging an appeal, including timely filing of the notice of appeal and requesting certified copies of proceedings. The court held that the interests of justice favored maintaining the status quo to facilitate the hearing and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1010 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: George PB Ogengo; Defendant: James Nandasaba; Defendant: Martin Wanyonyi; Defendant: Kennedy Wepulhulu; Defendant: The Standard Ltd; Defendant: Centre for Human Rights & Democracy (CHRD)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 27 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Process, Security for Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeal Process Security for Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George PB Ogengo

Plaintiff

James Nandasaba

Defendant

Martin Wanyonyi

Defendant

Kennedy Wepulhulu

Defendant

The Standard Ltd

Defendant

Centre for Human Rights & Democracy (CHRD)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice require maintenance of status quo pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had taken all necessary preliminary steps towards lodging an appeal, including timely filing of the notice of appeal and requesting certified copies of proceedings. The court held that the interests of justice favored maintaining the status quo to facilitate the hearing and determination of the appeal, as an aggrieved party is entitled to a second opinion from an appellate court. The court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution, conditional upon the applicant depositing the entire judgment amount in court within thirty days, failing which the stay would lapse.

Court Disposition

application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Stay of execution granted pending appeal, conditional upon the appellant depositing the entire judgment amount in court within thirty days of the order.
  • In default of deposit, the stay order shall lapse.