[2017] KEELRC 797 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant failed to take any meaningful steps to prosecute the suit between June 2012 and April 2016, resulting in an inordinate delay. The court held that such delay was prejudicial to the respondent and could not be remedied by an award of costs. The court further found no justification to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 797 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: George Peter Mutiso; Respondent: Jimack Enginnering Workshop
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 726 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- NJ Abuodha
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Inordinate Delay, Duty to Prosecute, Setting Aside Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Peter Mutiso
Claimant
Jimack Enginnering Workshop
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant has provided sufficient justification to set aside the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution.
- 2 Whether the delay in prosecuting the suit was inordinate and prejudicial to the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant failed to take any meaningful steps to prosecute the suit between June 2012 and April 2016, resulting in an inordinate delay. The court held that such delay was prejudicial to the respondent and could not be remedied by an award of costs. The court further found no justification to set aside the dismissal order, emphasizing the claimant's primary responsibility to progress their case. The application to set aside the dismissal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to set aside the dismissal for want of prosecution is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 726 OF 2011
GEORGE PETER MUTISO …….…………………… CLAIMANT
VERSUS
JIMACK ENGINNERING WORKSHOP ……..... RESPONDENT
Mr. Mutuku for claimant/applicant
Mr. Gichamba for respondent
RULING
1. The suit was dismissed by Hon. Byram Ongaya suo moto on 19th April 2016 for want of prosecution. Court notes that at the time, the court had a service week to deal with matters that had not been prosecuted for a long time.
2. The suit was filed in this court on 8th of May 2011.
3. From the record, the last step by the parties was on 15th June 2012, when Mr. Omogo for Mr. Amata for the claimant took a hearing date before Hon. Justice Paul Kosgei for 19th October 2012.
4. No other step was taken by the claimant until when a hearing notice dated 22nd March 2016 was issued to the parties by the court and both parties did not appear for the hearing.
5. The applicant states that they were not served with a notice to show cause and also states without substantiation that the suit had fallen victim to sudden closure of the court diary on several occasions.
6. The record does not show any attempt by the claimant to take a hearing or mention date between 15th June 2012 and 19th April 2016, when the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution.
7. The court agrees with the finding in Utalii Transport Company Limited and 3 others Vs. NIC Bank & another [2014] eKLR where the judge stated “it is the primary duty of the plaintiffs to take steps to progress their case since they are the ones who dragged the defendant in court.”
8. It is clear that the inordinate delay by the claimant is prejudicial to the respondent in a manner that cannot be remedied by costs. The suit has been hovering over the head of the respondent for over five years.
9. The court finds no justification to set aside the order of Ongaya J. to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
10. The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Dated and Signed at Nairobi this 18th day of August, 2017.
MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 18th day of August, 2017.
JORAM NELSON ABUODHA
JUDGE
Delivered in the presence of:
………………………………………….………………..
……….……………………………….………………….
………………………………………….………..………
…………………………………………….……………..
………………………………………………….………..