[2013] KEHC 2962 (KLR)
The court found that the consent agreement presented by the parties was duly executed by all litigants and their advocates, and that it satisfied all legal requirements for a binding consent order. There was no evidence of fraud, collusion, misapprehension, or any other ground that would justify the court's refusal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 2962 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: George Thuranira M'Itabari; Appellant: Gideon Ndwaru Ithikua; Appellant: Stephen Miriti; Respondent: Kagaene Community Water Project (suing through its officials: Albert Pius Mutea – chairman, Samuel Ntoiti – Secretary & Philip Kairithia – Treasurer)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 64 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal; Adoption of Consent as Order
- Outcome
- Appeal and original suit marked as settled by consent; consent adopted as order of the court.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Consent Judgments, Settlement of Disputes, Community Water Projects, Committee Management, Bank Signatory Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Thuranira M'Itabari
Appellant
Gideon Ndwaru Ithikua
Appellant
Stephen Miriti
Appellant
Kagaene Community Water Project (suing through its officials: Albert Pius Mutea – chairman, Samuel Ntoiti – Secretary & Philip Kairithia – Treasurer)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal; Adoption of Consent as Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent filed by the parties should be adopted as an order of the court.
- 2 Whether the consent satisfies the legal requirements for binding effect on the parties.
- 3 Whether there are grounds for the court to refuse to adopt the consent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the consent agreement presented by the parties was duly executed by all litigants and their advocates, and that it satisfied all legal requirements for a binding consent order. There was no evidence of fraud, collusion, misapprehension, or any other ground that would justify the court's refusal to adopt the consent. The court relied on established legal principles that consent orders are binding unless vitiated by specific defects. Accordingly, the court adopted the consent as an order, marking both the appeal and the original suit as settled, and directed compliance with the terms agreed by the parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal and original suit marked as settled by consent; consent adopted as order of the court.
Orders
- The consent dated 27th February 2013 and filed on 13th March 2013 is adopted as an order of the court.
- The management structure of Kagaene Community Water Project is to be as agreed in the consent until 30th August 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
83 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
ELC APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2012
GEORGE THURANIRA M'ITABARI..................................................1ST APPELLANT
GIDEON NDWARU ITHIKUA...........................................................2ND APPELLANT
STEPHEN MIRITI...............................................................................3RD APPELLANT
VERSUS
KAGAENE COMMUNITY WATER PROJECT
(suing through its officials; Albert Pius Mutea – chairman,
Samuel Ntoiti – Secretary & Philip Kairithia – Treasurer........................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
This suit was an appeal from the ruling/order of Honourable B. Ochieng, Senior Principal Magistrate dated 26th June, 2012 in Tigania SRMCC No. 31 of 2012 (KAGAENE COMMUNITY WATER PROJECT (suing through its officials: ALBERT PIUS MUTEA – CHAIRMAN, SAMUEL NTOITI – SECRETARY and PHILIP KAIRITHIA – TREASURER VERSUS GEORGE THURANIRA M'ITABARI, GIDEON NDWARU ITHIKUA AND STEPHEN MIRITI)
On 20. 6.2013, Miss Waithaka, holding brief for the firm of Carlpeters Mbaabu & Co, Advocates and Mr. Muriithi holding brief for the firm of Kiautha Arithi & Co. Advocates, presented a consent dated 27. 2.2013 and filed on 13. 3.2013 to the Court. They prayed that the terms of consent be adopted as an order of the Court. The consent reads as follows:
“By consent of all parties;
that this matter be marked as settled on the following terms;
That it is hereby recognized that Kagaene Community Water Project consists of two major lines to wit Kaliati Branch line and Njia branch line and one minor Kamaruki line.
That each of the three said water branches up to 30th August 2013 be run by the following committee members to wit;
(a) KALIATI BRANCH
- GEORGE THURANIRA M'ITABARI - Chairman
- GEDEON NDWARU ITHIKUA - Secretary
- PHILIP KAIRITHIA - V/Chairman
- STELLA NKATHA - Treasurer
- FLORENCE KINYA - V/Secretary
- SALESIO MURIUKI - Committee Member
- JOHN MURURU - Committee Member
- IBRAHIM GITONGA - Committee Member
- JULIUS MUTUA - Committee Member
(b) NJIA BRANCH
- ZAKAYO KABERIA - Chairman
- ALBERT PIUS MUTEA - Committee Member
- SAMUEL NTOITI - V/Secretary
- STEPHEN M. MIRITI - Treasurer
- JULIUS KATHANJE - V/Chairman
- SHADRACK KIAMBI - Secretary
- MARTHA NKATHA - Committee member
- TRIPHOSA KALINGU -Committee member
- PETER GIKURI -Committee member
That up to 30th August, 2013 the entire Kagaene Community Water Project to be ran by a representative board made up as follows:
NJIA
- ZAKAYO KABERIA
- ALBERT PIUS MUTEA
- STEPHEN M. MIRITI
- SAMUEL NTOITI
KALIATI
- GEORGE THURANIRA M'ITABARI
- GIDEON NDWARU ITHIKUA
- PHILIP KAIRITHIA
- STELLA NKATHA
KAMARUKI
-JOSEPH THARIMBU
THAT the Kagaene community Water Project already existing Equity Bank Meru Branch Account No. 0140190989921 retain the registered signatories thereto namely ALBERT PIUS MUTEA, SAMUEL NTOITI LIBURU and PHILIP KAIRITHIA but with GEORGE THURANIRA M'ITABARI ID NO.2364953 and GEDION NDWARU ITHIKUA ID NO.8859363 as additional compulsory signatories thereto. This order be served upon the Equity Bank Meru Branch Manager for compliance
THAT effective 1st September 2013 the members of Kagaene Community Water Project be at liberty to conduct a full election.
THAT it is hereby agreed that the water reservoir (control chamber) situate in Kagaene area within Mbeu location has already been opened for free and continuous flow of water to all the members of Kagaene Community Water Project
THAT both this matter and TIGANIA PMCC No. 31 of 2012 be marked as settled with each party bearing their own costs.
WE CONSENT”.
ALBERT PIPUS MUTEA
ID NO.9908838
SAMUEL NTOITI LIBURU
ID NO. 12496611
PHILIP KAIRITHIA
ID NO. 2369409
GEORGE THURANIRA M'ITABARI
ID NO. 2364952
GIDEON NDWARU ITHIKUA
ID NO. 8859363
STEPHEN B. MIRITI
ID NO.16120720
FOR: KIAUTHA ARITHI & CO.
ADVOCATES FOR THE APPELLLANTS
FOR: CARLPETERS MBAABU & CO.
ADVOCATES FOR THE RESPONDENTS
In adopting the consent as an order of the court I take cognizance of the Case of Hiren V Kassam (EACA), 19,which quoted and approved the following passege from set of judgments and orders, 7th edition Volume 1 Page 124
: “Prima facie, any order made in in the presence and with the consent of counsel is binding on all parties to the proceedings or action, and on those claiming under them.... and cannot be varied or discharged unless obtained by fraud or Collusion, or by an agreement contrary to the police of Court..... or if consent was given without sufficient material facts, or in misapprehension or ignorance of material facts or in general for any reason which would enable to set aside an agreement between the parties”.
The consent herein is signed by the litigants and by their advocates. I find that the consent satisfies all the conditions which would not invite a Court to interfere with its terms at all.
As was held in the English case of HUDDESFIELD BANKING CO LTD Vs. HENRY LISTER AND SON LTD (1895) 2 CH d.p. 273 BY Lindley, j at 280, an agreement that cannot be invalidated is good. If it can be invalidated, it is bad. This consent is good.
In the circumstances, I adopt the consent as an order of this Court. For avoidance of doubt, this suit and TIGANIA PMCC NO.31 OF 2012 are marked as settled.
It is so ordered.
Delivered and Signed in Open Court at Meru this 20th day of June, 2013 in the presence of:
Cc. Daniel
Miss Waithaka h/b Carl Peters Mbaabu for Respondents
Atheru for Appellants.
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE