[2014] KEHC 1175 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 1175 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of land parcel LR Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/634 from the certificate of confirmation of grant was an error. The applicant provided documentary evidence that the parcel belonged to the deceased and obtained the written consent of the other dependants for its inclusion and distribution....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 1175 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geremano Mukundi; Respondent: Susan Wairimu Muthon
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Murang'a
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause Cause1 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Application for rectification of the confirmed grant allowed; proposed distribution of additional property granted.
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geremano Mukundi

Applicant

Susan Wairimu Muthon

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant should be rectified to include land parcel LR Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/634 as part of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed distribution of the additional property to the applicant is proper.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of land parcel LR Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/634 from the certificate of confirmation of grant was an error. The applicant provided documentary evidence that the parcel belonged to the deceased and obtained the written consent of the other dependants for its inclusion and distribution. There was no opposition to the application. The court held that, in accordance with the Law of Succession Act and the Probate and Administration Rules, it was proper to rectify the grant to include the omitted property and to distribute it as proposed. The application for rectification and the proposed distribution were therefore allowed.

Court Disposition

Application for rectification of the confirmed grant allowed; proposed distribution of additional property granted.

Orders

  • The certificate of confirmation of grant is rectified to include land parcel LR Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/634 as part of the deceased's estate.
  • Land parcel LR Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/634 is distributed to Geremano Mukundi.