[2023] KEHC 23931 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 23931 (KLR)

The court declined to revise the three-year imprisonment sentence imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing, citing the applicant's status as a habitual offender, lack of remorse, and absence of evidence of reformation. However, the court ordered that the sentence be calculated from the date of arrest...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 23931 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Melvin Ochieng Geri; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E038 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision
Outcome
Sentence revision declined; order for sentence to run from date of arrest.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Stealing Offence, Penal Code Section 275, Habitual Offender, Pre Sentence Report, Calculation of Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Stealing Offence Penal Code Section 275 Habitual Offender Pre Sentence Report Calculation of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Melvin Ochieng Geri

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a revision of the sentence imposed for the offence of stealing.
  2. 2 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in calculating the applicant's sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to revise the three-year imprisonment sentence imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing, citing the applicant's status as a habitual offender, lack of remorse, and absence of evidence of reformation. However, the court ordered that the sentence be calculated from the date of arrest (6th March 2022), in accordance with the law requiring that time spent in custody prior to sentencing be considered. The court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the sentence itself but ensured compliance with statutory requirements regarding computation of the sentence period.

Court Disposition

Sentence revision declined; order for sentence to run from date of arrest.

Orders

  • The application for sentence revision is declined.
  • The three years imprisonment shall be calculated from the date of arrest on 6th March 2022.