[2022] KEBPRT 52 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Landlord's bill of costs was generally within the reasonable confines of the law, with most items taxed in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014. Where items were found excessive or not in compliance with the specific paragraphs of the Order, the Tribunal taxed off the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 52 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Gerrick (K) Limited; Applicant: Dakianga Distributors Limited; Respondent: Hezron Getuma Onsong T/A Hegeons Auctioneers
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 32 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Taxation Ruling / Taxation of Party and Party Bill of Costs After Dismissal of Tenant's Application
- Outcome
- Landlord's bill of costs taxed and allowed at Kshs. 93,287.70; Tenant to pay within 30 days.
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Business Premises Rent Tribunal, Distress for Rent, Instruction Fees, Advocates Remuneration Order
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerrick (K) Limited
Respondent
Dakianga Distributors Limited
Applicant
Hezron Getuma Onsong T/A Hegeons Auctioneers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Taxation Ruling / Taxation of Party and Party Bill of Costs After Dismissal of Tenant's Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Landlord's party and party bill of costs dated 17th August 2021 is reasonable and in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order.
- 2 What quantum of costs should be awarded to the Landlord following the dismissal of the Tenant's application.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Landlord's bill of costs was generally within the reasonable confines of the law, with most items taxed in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014. Where items were found excessive or not in compliance with the specific paragraphs of the Order, the Tribunal taxed off the excess amounts. The instruction fees and other major items were found to be reasonable, and the total bill was adjusted accordingly. The Tribunal concluded that the Landlord was entitled to costs as the successful party following the dismissal of the Tenant's application, and the final taxed amount reflected a fair application of the relevant legal principles and statutory...
Court Disposition
Landlord's bill of costs taxed and allowed at Kshs. 93,287.70; Tenant to pay within 30 days.
Orders
- The Landlord's bill of costs dated 17th August 2021 is taxed at Kshs. 93,287.70.
- The Tenant shall pay the taxed costs within 30 days from service of the certified order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
128 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI
TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 32 OF 2018 (KISII)
GERRICK (K) LIMITED………………….………………TENANT/RESPONDENT
-VERSUS-
DAKIANGA DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED…………...…LANDLORD/APPLICANT
TAXATION RULING
A. Parties and Their Representative
1. The Tenant/Applicant, GERRICK (K) LIMITED(hereinafter referred to as the “Tenant”) has been in occupation of the Premises belonging to the 1st Respondent for a term of 5 years and 3 months, from May 2015 to 31st July 2020
2. The Firm of Ochoki & Company Advocates represent the Tenant/Applicant. violetmoraa89@gmail.com, wochoki@yahoo.com
3. The Landlord/1st Respondent, DAKIANGA DISTRIBUTORS LIMTIED(hereinafter referred to as the “Landlord”) is the registered owner and Landlord of the Premises rented out to the Tenant/Applicant
4. The 2nd Respondent HEZRON GETUMA ONSONGO T/A HEGEONS AUCTIONEERS(hereinafter referred to as the “Auctioneer”) was authorized by the Landlord to act for them in distressing for rent from the Tenant
5. The Firm of Nyamurongi & Company Advocates represent the Landlord. info@nyamurongiadvocates.com
B. THE DISPUTE BACKGROUND
6. On 23rd November 2021, the Tenant filed a reference and a notice of motion application under certificate of urgency before this Tribunal alleging that the Landlord had instructed the Auctioneers to proclaim properties belonging to the Tenant as distress for rent arears amounting to Kshs. 1,044,000. 00/-.
7. In response, the Landlord filed a replying affidavit dated 12th February 2021 where he relied on the decision of Honourable J.M Mutungi of the Environment and Land Court Act in the matter of Dakainga Distributors Limited Versus Pebo (Kenya) Limited Appeal No. 3 of 2018, in which matters pertaining the tenancy relationship between the Tenant and Landlord were addressed. The aforesaid decision held that a tenancy relationship existed between the Landlord and Tenant herein, by virtue of the unexecuted lease, which was for a term of 5 years and 3 months at the initial rent of Kshs. 30,000. 00/- per month. The Landlord further averred that the Tenant had defaulted in the payment of rent and had arrears amounting to Kshs. 1,044,000. 00/-.
8. On 11th June 2021 the Tribunal gave orders that the Tenants application 23rd November 2021 was dismissed with costs, to the Landlord.
9. The Landlord filed a party and party bill of costs dated 17th August 2021 which bill is drawn to the sum of KShs. 93,408. 84.
10. The only remaining issue for this Tribunal to determine in relation to this matter is the quantum of costs to be awarded to the Landlord. Having taken note of the guiding principles of taxation, the Tribunal now proceeds to determine the computation of each item as follows;
ITEM DATE PARTICULARS AMOUNT CHARGED
(APPLICANTS) AMOUNT TAXED OFF (RESPONDENT) AMOUNT TAXED OFF (TRIBUNAL)
1. 10/02/2019 Instruction fees to oppose the reference for rent arrears of KShs. 1,252,800
VAT @ 14% on the instruction fees 55,056/=
7,707. 84/=
55,056/=
2. 12/02/2019 Drawing Affidavit in reply to application dated 23/11/2018
Attending the Tribunal registry to file Notice to Cross-examine and reply affidavit 500/=
1,400/=
500/=
1,000/=
3. 15/02/2019 Serving replying affidavit on Tenants Advocates in Kisii 1,4000/=
1,400/=
4. 22/02/2019 Attending court for hearing 4,000/=
4,000/=
5. 9/4/2019 Attending Tribunal registry to file submissions 1,400/=
1,000/=
6. 13/05/219 Serving Submissions upon the Tenant’s Advocates in Kisii 1,400/=
1,400/=
7. 25/08/2020 Serving letter to the Chairman of the Tribunal at Nairobi 7,000/=
4,608. 40/=
8. 1/03/2011 Attending court for mention 1,400/=
1,400/=
9. 30/03/2021 Attending court for mention 1,400/=
1,400/=
10. 12/04/2021 Attending court for mention 1,400/=
1,400/=
11. 21/05/2021 Attending court for mention 1,400/=
1,400/=
12. 11/06/2021 Attending court for judgement 1,400/=
1,400/=
13.
Attending the registry to file the Bill of Costs 500/=
500/=
14.
Serving this Bill of Costs upon the Tenant’s advocates in Kisii 1,400/=
1,400/=
15.
Attending court for taxation 4,000/=
1,400/=
SUBTOTAL
92,763. 84 /= 75,864. 40 79,864. 40/=
Add 16% VAT
12,138. 30 12,778. 30/=
TOTAL AMOUNT
88,002. 70 92,642. 70/=
COURT FEES
16.
Court fees on Notice to examine 270/=
270/=
17.
Court fees on submissions 50/=
50/=
18.
Court fees on the Bill of Costs 325/=
325/=
Sub Total 645/=
645/=
GRAND TOTAL 93,408. 84/=
BILL OF COSTS TAXED AT 93,408. 84/=
93,287. 70/=
Particulars
1) Item 1- Instruction Fees:
As per the provisions of Paragraph 7(2)(a) of Schedule 8of the Advocates Remuneration Order, the instruction fees sought is not excessive and is within the reasonable bounds of the law. Excluding VAT at 14 %
Amount taxed at Kshs. 55,056/=
2) Item 2- Drawing Affidavit-Amount taxed is okay and in accordance to Paragraph 8(g) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order,2014.
- Attending the Tribunal registry to file Notice to Cross-examine and replying affidavit –Amount taxed is excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(b) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014. Amount taxed Kshs. 1,000/=.
3) Item 3- Serving Replying Affidavit on Tenant’s Advocates in Kisii:
Amount taxed is okay and in tandem withParagraph 8 (e)(i) of Schedule 8of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
4) Item 4- Attending court for hearing:
Amount taxed is okay and in accordance toParagraph 8 (c)(i) of Schedule 8of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014
5) Item 5- Attending Tribunal registry to file Submissions:
Amount taxed is excessive and not in accordance toParagraph 8 (b) of Schedule 8of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014
Amount taxed Kshs. 1,000/=.
6) Item 6- Attending Tribunal registry to file Submissions:
Amount taxed is okay and in accordance to Paragraph 8(e)(i) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
7) Item 7- Serving letter to the Chairman of the Tribunal at Nairobi;
Amount taxed is excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(e)(i)(ii) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
Amount taxed Kshs. 4,608. 40/-
8) Item 8- Attending court for mention;
Amount taxed is not excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
9) Item 9- Attending court for mention;
Amount taxed is not excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
10) Item 10- Attending court for judgement;
Amount taxed is not excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
11) Item 11- Attending court for judgement;
Amount taxed is not excessive and in accordance to Paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 8of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014
12) Item 12- Attending court for judgement;
Amount taxed is not excessive and in accordance to Paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
13) Item 13- Attending the registry to file the Bill of costs;
Amount taxed is excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(g) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
14) Item 14- Serving Bill of Costs upon the Tenant’s advocate in Kisii
Amount taxed is excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(e)(i)(ii) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
15) Item 15- Attending court for taxation;
Amount taxed is excessive and not in accordance to Paragraph 8(c)(i) of Schedule 8 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014.
Amount taxed Kshs. 1,400. 00/-.
11. Based on these provisions of the Law, and having considered the Landlord’s submission, it is the conclusion of this Tribunal that the Bill of Costs have been drawn within the reasonable confines of the Law.
12. Based on the foregoing, the Landlord’s Bill of Costs dated 17th August 2021 is taxed at KShs. 93,287. 70/=
ORDERS
For the reasons given above I ORDER as follows;
1. The Tribunal taxes the Landlord’s bill dated 17th August 2021 at Kshs. 93,287. 70/=
2. The tenant shall pay the costs within 30 days from the date of being served with a certified copy of the order.
HON A. MUMA
VICE CHAIR
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Ruling dated, signed and delivered virtually by Hon A. Muma this 1stday ofMarch, 2022 in the presence of Nyamwongifor the Landlordand in the absence of the Tenants.
HON A. MUMA
VICE CHAIR
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL