[2022] KEET 789 (KLR)

[2022] KEET 789 (KLR)

The Tribunal determined that it lacked original jurisdiction to hear disputes regarding charges and disconnection of power supply where the complainant had not first exhausted remedies before the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA). This decision was guided by the statutory framework under the Energy...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEET 789 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gerrsau Limited; Respondent: Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited
Court
Energy & Petroleum Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Appeal EPA E015 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Appeal / Directions
Outcome
Dispute referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution; Tribunal declined to exercise jurisdiction at this stage.
Judges
D.K Mwirigi
Legal Topics
Energy Regulation, Dispute Resolution, Regulatory Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Commercial and Corporate Energy Regulation Dispute Resolution Regulatory Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gerrsau Limited

Applicant

Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Appeal / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the Energy & Petroleum Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear disputes over charges leading to disconnection or discontinuance of power supply before exhaustion of remedies at EPRA.
  2. 2 Whether the dispute should be referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution in accordance with the Energy Act, 2019 and relevant regulations.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal determined that it lacked original jurisdiction to hear disputes regarding charges and disconnection of power supply where the complainant had not first exhausted remedies before the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA). This decision was guided by the statutory framework under the Energy Act, 2019 and the Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations, 2012, which require such disputes to be initially addressed by EPRA. The Tribunal also relied on its own precedent in a similar matter (Joyce Deche Kai v Kenya Power and Lighting Company), reinforcing the principle that regulatory processes must be followed before judicial or quasi-judicial intervention....

Court Disposition

Dispute referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution; Tribunal declined to exercise jurisdiction at this stage.

Orders

  • The dispute is referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution.
  • The Tribunal declines to exercise jurisdiction in the first instance.