[2002] KEHC 579 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 579 (KLR)

The court found that the third party was not a party to the consent order between the plaintiff and defendant and had not advanced any sufficient reasons or grounds to justify the review or setting aside of the consent. The plaintiff's evidence established ownership of the vehicle and lack of knowledge of the third...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 579 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gibier Branduzzi; Defendant: Hamisi Abkahim Swaleh
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 260 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Review Consent Order
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Consent Orders, Review of Orders, Third Party Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Consent Orders Review of Orders Third Party Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gibier Branduzzi

Plaintiff

Hamisi Abkahim Swaleh

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Review Consent Order

  1. 1 Whether a third party can seek review of a consent order to which they are not a party.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient grounds exist to set aside or review a consent order between the plaintiff and defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the third party was not a party to the consent order between the plaintiff and defendant and had not advanced any sufficient reasons or grounds to justify the review or setting aside of the consent. The plaintiff's evidence established ownership of the vehicle and lack of knowledge of the third party. In the absence of fraud, collusion, or mistake, and with no exceptional circumstances shown, the court held that the application to review the consent order was without merit and dismissed it with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application to review the consent order is dismissed with costs.