[1997] KECA 246 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 246 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice of Appeal filed by the respondents was not signed as required by rule 74(6) of the Court of Appeal Rules. Even if the existing signature was considered, there should have been two signatures, not just one. Furthermore, since no appeal was lodged after the filing of the notice, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 246 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gibson Mugwe Murathi; Respondent: Wangari Kanyari Mwangi Ndoria
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 343 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to applicant
Judges
RO Kwach, GS Pall
Legal Topics
Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules, Striking Out Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules Striking Out Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gibson Mugwe Murathi

Applicant

Wangari Kanyari Mwangi Ndoria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Appeal filed by the respondents was invalid for lack of proper signature as required by the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a valid Notice of Appeal results in the notice being deemed withdrawn under rule 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice of Appeal filed by the respondents was not signed as required by rule 74(6) of the Court of Appeal Rules. Even if the existing signature was considered, there should have been two signatures, not just one. Furthermore, since no appeal was lodged after the filing of the notice, the notice was deemed withdrawn under rule 82. The combination of these procedural defects rendered the Notice of Appeal invalid, and the court accordingly struck it out with costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to applicant

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal filed by the respondents on 24th May, 1995, is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant.