[2021] KEHC 3464 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3464 (KLR)

The court found that its order of 6th May 2019 did not direct the consolidation of Succession Cause No. 2281 of 2014 and 2634 of 2000, but merely required the files to be placed together for reference. The application for review was therefore based on a misreading of the court's order. The court emphasized that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 3464 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gicheru Waweru Wahinya; Applicant: Francis Ndungu Waweru; Respondent: Robert Thiongo Kariuki; Respondent: Leonard Munyua Mbugua; Respondent: Beatrice Wanjiku Nguhi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2281 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Order
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Review of Court Orders, Succession Proceedings, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Review of Court Orders Succession Proceedings Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gicheru Waweru Wahinya

Applicant

Francis Ndungu Waweru

Applicant

Robert Thiongo Kariuki

Respondent

Leonard Munyua Mbugua

Respondent

Beatrice Wanjiku Nguhi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the court order of 6th May 2019 directed consolidation of Succession Cause No. 2281 of 2014 and 2634 of 2000.
  2. 2 Whether the application for review is merited or constitutes an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that its order of 6th May 2019 did not direct the consolidation of Succession Cause No. 2281 of 2014 and 2634 of 2000, but merely required the files to be placed together for reference. The application for review was therefore based on a misreading of the court's order. The court emphasized that consolidation is a formal process that combines matters for hearing, which was not ordered in this instance. The application was deemed a waste of judicial time and an abuse of court process, and was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 23rd February 2021 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.