[2022] KEHC 10142 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10142 (KLR)

The court found that the 3rd defendant had demonstrated repeated efforts to obtain the original deposit receipt from the plaintiff's advocates, who failed to provide it since 2014. The court accepted that the applicant had provided sufficient alternative evidence of the deposit (bankers cheques and a letter from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10142 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Hezekiah W. Gichohi; Defendant: Uhuru Highway Development Ltd; Defendant: Central Bank of Kenya; Defendant: Libyan Arab African Investment Co. Ltd t/a Grand Regency Hotel
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 292 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Post Judgment Motion for Release of Deposited Funds
Outcome
Application allowed. Administrative requirement for original receipt dispensed with. Deputy Registrar to verify and release Kshs. 5 million to 3rd defendant. Each party to bear own costs.
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Release of Deposit, Consent Orders, Court Administration, Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Release of Deposit Consent Orders Court Administration Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hezekiah W. Gichohi

Plaintiff

Uhuru Highway Development Ltd

Defendant

Central Bank of Kenya

Defendant

Libyan Arab African Investment Co. Ltd t/a Grand Regency Hotel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Post Judgment Motion for Release of Deposited Funds

  1. 1 Whether the court should dispense with the administrative requirement for production of the original deposit receipt as a pre-condition for release of funds to the 3rd defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the Deputy Registrar should accept alternative evidence of deposit and proceed to release the funds as per the consent order of 21st October 2014.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 3rd defendant had demonstrated repeated efforts to obtain the original deposit receipt from the plaintiff's advocates, who failed to provide it since 2014. The court accepted that the applicant had provided sufficient alternative evidence of the deposit (bankers cheques and a letter from the plaintiff's advocates) and that the administrative requirement for the original receipt should not prevent compliance with the consent order. The court exercised its discretion to dispense with the requirement for the original receipt and directed the Deputy Registrar to verify the deposit using the alternative evidence and, upon confirmation, to release the Kshs. 5 million to...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Administrative requirement for original receipt dispensed with. Deputy Registrar to verify and release Kshs. 5 million to 3rd defendant. Each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The administrative requirement for the 3rd defendant’s counsel to produce the original deposit receipt as a pre-condition for compliance with the release order of 21st October 2014 is dispensed with.
  • The Deputy Registrar and relevant officers are directed to accept the letter from the plaintiff’s advocates dated 17th June 2012 and bankers cheques as prima facie evidence of deposit of Kshs. 5 million.