[2024] KEHC 9816 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had deposited a cash bail of Kshs. 30,000 at Gilgil Police Station but there was no evidence that he was ever charged in court or took plea. In such circumstances, the police had no lawful basis to continue withholding the cash bail. The respondents did not oppose the application...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 9816 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Mwangi Gichuki; Respondent: National Police Service; Respondent: Officer Commanding Gilgil Police Station; Respondent: Director Criminal Investigations; Respondent: Director Of Public Prosecution; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application E040 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Release of Cash Bail
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- PN Gichohi
- Legal Topics
- Release of Cash Bail, Police Powers, Court Orders Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Mwangi Gichuki
Applicant
National Police Service
Respondent
Officer Commanding Gilgil Police Station
Respondent
Director Criminal Investigations
Respondent
Director Of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Release of Cash Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to the release of the cash bail deposited at Gilgil Police Station.
- 2 Whether the continued withholding of the cash bail by the police is lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had deposited a cash bail of Kshs. 30,000 at Gilgil Police Station but there was no evidence that he was ever charged in court or took plea. In such circumstances, the police had no lawful basis to continue withholding the cash bail. The respondents did not oppose the application or provide any justification for retaining the funds. Accordingly, the court held that the applicant was entitled to the immediate release of the cash bail deposited, as continued withholding was unjustified and contrary to established legal principles regarding the handling of cash bail by police authorities.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The cash bail of Kshs. 30,000 deposited by the applicant at Gilgil Police Station/DCI Gilgil on 30/03/2023 shall be released to the applicant forthwith.
- There are no orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
Gichuki v National Police Service & 4 others (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E040 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 9816 (KLR) (25 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9816 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E040 of 2023
PN Gichohi, J
July 25, 2024
Between
David Mwangi Gichuki
Applicant
and
National Police Service
1st Respondent
Officer Commanding Gilgil Police Station
2nd Respondent
Director Criminal Investigations
3rd Respondent
Director Of Public Prosecution
4th Respondent
Attorney General
5th Respondent
Ruling
1. By a Notice of Motion dated 3rd April 2023 and Amended on 4th July 2023, the Applicant moved this Court under Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 seeking orders:-1. Spent.2. Spent.3. Spent.4. That the Applicant’s cash bail of Kshs. 30,000/= be released to the Applicant.
2. The grounds on the face of the application and supported by the Affidavit sworn by David Mwangi Gichuki on 4th July 2023 are that as a licenced Auctioneer trading as Davies Auctioneering Services, he was issued with Warrants of Attachment and Sale of the Respondent’s movable assets in Nakuru SCC COMM Case No. 533 of 2022 Thomas Machuma Nyamota t/a Beemtho Services Limited v David Ngugi t/a Silver Hill School.
3. He therefore proceeded to the Respondent’s place of business and proclaimed the Respondent’s assets on 23rd January 2023.
4. However, the Respondent was violent when he was served with the proclamation prompting the Applicant herein to apply before the court for police assistance and indeed, he was issued with an order dated 14th February 2023 for OCS Gilgil to assist him. He therefore served the said OCS with the Order and proceedings on 17th March 2023 which was later amended on 28th March 2023 from the court as it cited the wrong case number.
5. He proceeded to OCS Gilgil on 29th March 2023 for assistance but he was locked up on the grounds that the Order issued on 14th February was fake for it was not verified. At that point, the Applicant called his advocates and who in turn moved the court and an order for the Applicant’s release.
6. The OCS Gilgil however refused to release the Applicant and instead referred the matter to the DCI. The Applicant was released on a cash bail of Ksh. 30,000/= with instructions to appear before Naivasha Court on the 4th April 2023 on a charge of purgery. He urged the Court to allow his application.
7. Though served, there was no response to this application by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Respondent. The 4th Respondent however filed Replying Affidavit sworn on 19th March 2024 by James Kihara for the 4th Respondent. He deponed that the office of the 4th Respondent is not privy to the facts of the case and in any event, if the Applicant is aggrieved that orders issued by the court were not complied with, he should have filed contempt of court proceedings against the Contemnor. He therefore urged the Applicant to withdraw the 4th Respondent from these proceedings.
Determination 8. The 4th Respondent’s application was not opposed. In any event, there is nothing to show how the 4th Respondent was involved tin this matter . His request was allowed. The 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 5th Respondents never responded to this application and did not attend court thus leaving the application unopposed.
9. It is apparent that the only issue here is release of the cash bail from Gilgil Police Station and as confirmed by the copy of the receipt annexed to the supporting Affidavit, the amount is Kshs. 30,000/=. There is no evidence attached to show that the Applicant appeared in court for plea whereupon the Police Cash bail ought to have been released to the Applicant immediately upon taking plea to use it as he deemed fit.
10. In the circumstances, there is no reason why the police should continue withholding it if they have not yet done so.
11. For those reasons the application 4th July 2023 is allowed that:-1. The Cash bail of Kshs. 30,000/= deposited by the Applicant at Gilgil Police Station/ DCI Gilgil on 30/03/2023 be released to the Applicant forthwith.2. There are no orders as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2024. PATRICIA GICHOHIJUDGEIn the presence of:N/A for Mr. Bosire for ApplicantN/A for RespondentsRuto- Court Assistant