[2016] KEELRC 878 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 878 (KLR)

The court found that the Petitioners, as Youth Polytechnic Instructors, were entitled to absorption on permanent and pensionable terms by the 1st Respondent, following the binding intergovernmental resolution of 2 December 2014. The 1st Respondent, having participated in the resolution and not demonstrated any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 878 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gideon Bore and 32 Others; Respondent: Baringo County Public Service Board; Respondent: Transition Authority; Respondent: Public Service Commission; Respondent: Ministry of Education, Science & Technology
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 10 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition allowed. Declarations and orders granted in favour of the Petitioners.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Public Service Employment, Permanent and Pensionable Terms, Devolution of Functions, Employment Discrimination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Public Service Employment Permanent and Pensionable Terms Devolution of Functions Employment Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gideon Bore and 32 Others

Applicant

Baringo County Public Service Board

Respondent

Transition Authority

Respondent

Public Service Commission

Respondent

Ministry of Education, Science & Technology

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Petitioners are entitled to be absorbed by the 1st Respondent on permanent and pensionable terms as resolved by the Intergovernmental consultative forum.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st Respondent's issuance of short-term contracts instead of permanent and pensionable terms was discriminatory or unlawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Petitioners, as Youth Polytechnic Instructors, were entitled to absorption on permanent and pensionable terms by the 1st Respondent, following the binding intergovernmental resolution of 2 December 2014. The 1st Respondent, having participated in the resolution and not demonstrated any lawful or budgetary impediment, could not lawfully issue only short-term contracts. The court held that the Petitioners' rights under the Constitution and relevant statutes were violated by the failure to absorb them on permanent and pensionable terms from 1 July 2015. The court also noted that any subsequent settlement or offer of permanent terms should be backdated to the...

Court Disposition

Petition allowed. Declarations and orders granted in favour of the Petitioners.

Orders

  • The Petitioners are entitled to be absorbed by the 1st Respondent in its regular establishment on permanent and pensionable basis.
  • The 1st Respondent shall implement the decision of the Intergovernmental consultative forum made on 2 December 2014 to absorb the Petitioners on permanent and pensionable basis from 1 July 2015.