[2025] KEELC 3687 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 3687 (KLR)

The court found that the Petitioners had established sufficient grounds to be granted leave to amend their petition, as the 2nd Respondent had acquired a new property within Gideon Estate and intended to put up structures for worship. The amendment was necessary to reflect the current factual situation. However, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 3687 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gideon Estate Residential Association; Applicant: Josephat Karungo Waweru; Applicant: Ibrahim Oruma; Applicant: John Mureithi; Respondent: Stanley Maina; Respondent: ACK Rimpa Church, Diocese of Mount Kenya South; Respondent: Francis Kurende
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E002 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Petition and for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
application partially allowed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Temporary Injunctions, Church Land Disputes, Leave of Court, Interlocutory Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Temporary Injunctions Church Land Disputes Leave of Court Interlocutory Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gideon Estate Residential Association

Applicant

Josephat Karungo Waweru

Applicant

Ibrahim Oruma

Applicant

John Mureithi

Applicant

Stanley Maina

Respondent

ACK Rimpa Church, Diocese of Mount Kenya South

Respondent

Francis Kurende

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Petition and for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the Petitioners should be granted leave to amend their petition to reflect a new suit property.
  2. 2 Whether the Petitioners are entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the Respondents from conducting church activities or erecting structures on the new property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Petitioners had established sufficient grounds to be granted leave to amend their petition, as the 2nd Respondent had acquired a new property within Gideon Estate and intended to put up structures for worship. The amendment was necessary to reflect the current factual situation. However, the court declined to grant a temporary injunction because there was no evidence that the 2nd Respondent had commenced church services or construction on the new property. The threshold for a temporary injunction was therefore not met. The court allowed the application for leave to amend the petition and ordered that the draft amended petition be deemed duly filed upon payment of...

Court Disposition

application partially allowed

Orders

  • Petitioners are granted leave to amend the petition.
  • The draft amended petition is deemed duly filed upon payment of requisite fees.